Re: [PATCH 0829/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>]

On 02/08/16 13:50, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>

This is the worst series of lkml spam I've ever received!

1. Make something like this a series in one thread, not 1285 single
   threads! Add a cover letter.
2. Don't write one patch per source file, one per subsystem is enough.
   Maybe even better: make a tree-wide patch using Coccinelle.
3. Use better subjects. I want to see the subsystem the patch is
   modifying.
4. Use _correct_ maintainers. WTF do I have to do with pcmcia?


Juergen