* [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts
@ 2026-09-10 5:16 April Cardenas
2026-09-11 1:04 ` Namjae Jeon
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: April Cardenas @ 2026-09-10 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs
Cc: pc, linkinjeon, ronniesahlberg, sprasad, tom, bharathsm,
samba-technical, linux-kernel, April Cardenas, stable
Currently, when cifs_oplock_break handles a break request from the server
it searches for the appropriate tlink to handle the request
but incorrectly uses the current fsuid as the search key, eventually
causing read errors for users with multiuser mounts on NetApp.
Fix this by using the tlink from the cfile struct instead to respond
through the correct session.
As breaks are handled in a worker thread, the current fsuid
isn't guaranteed to match the session that the break is intended for.
This means that cifs_sb_tlink may search the rbtree using the wrong fsuid,
and return a tlink with an incorrect session than
the lease break was intended for. As a result, the breaks
may be ACKed through an incorrect session.
While it seems that Samba/Windows Servers 2016-2025 ignore this as long as
the lease key is correct, we ran into a case where if you're using
NetApp ONTAP or Azure NetApp Files they will reject the ACK
and return `STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED` errors on any future read requests
a user may initiate through their still held open file handle,
and the server will eventually close the file.
In the dmesg logs, the user may see errors like these:
CIFS: Status code returned 0xc0000128 STATUS_FILE_CLOSED
CIFS: VFS: Send error in read = -9
With a multiuser mount using NetApp, this issue is really easy
for users to hit on a wide variety of kernel versions
by attempting to copy a file from the share
to the local machine through GNOME Files/Nautilus.
This copy will always result in Nautilus throwing
a `Bad File Descriptor` error to the user and fail.
With this fix, you can copy files through Nautilus without issue.
From looking at the traces, it seems that glib will
open the file first, and call listxattr before actually attempting
to copy the file data. The listxattr call always triggers a break,
causing the copy to fail.
The proposed fix returns to the way the client grabbed the tlink before
commit e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break").
The bulk of that commit (checking for list empty) remains untouched, and
I think the change to using cifs_sb_tlink was intended to avoid a
NULL/ERR deference on the tlink as well as update the reference count.
I believe this fix should preserve those safety properties, but of course
I'd appreciate any corrections here.
Fixes: e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: April Cardenas <april.cardenas@canonical.com>
---
fs/smb/client/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/file.c b/fs/smb/client/file.c
index 1aa4844f8b8a..0d428517f454 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/file.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/file.c
@@ -3354,8 +3354,8 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
wait_on_bit(&cinode->flags, CIFS_INODE_PENDING_WRITERS,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- tlink = cifs_sb_tlink(cifs_sb);
- if (IS_ERR(tlink)) {
+ tlink = cifs_get_tlink(cfile->tlink);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tlink)) {
/* drop the reference taken when the break was queued */
_cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */, false);
goto out;
base-commit: cb26524ef4ac28fcfa554c0656e8dc412c38a8ff
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts
2026-09-10 5:16 [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts April Cardenas
@ 2026-09-11 1:04 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-09-11 12:31 ` Bharath SM
2026-09-11 19:28 ` Paulo Alcantara
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2026-09-11 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: April Cardenas
Cc: linux-cifs, pc, ronniesahlberg, sprasad, tom, bharathsm,
samba-technical, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 2:17 PM April Cardenas
<april.cardenas@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, when cifs_oplock_break handles a break request from the server
> it searches for the appropriate tlink to handle the request
> but incorrectly uses the current fsuid as the search key, eventually
> causing read errors for users with multiuser mounts on NetApp.
> Fix this by using the tlink from the cfile struct instead to respond
> through the correct session.
>
> As breaks are handled in a worker thread, the current fsuid
> isn't guaranteed to match the session that the break is intended for.
> This means that cifs_sb_tlink may search the rbtree using the wrong fsuid,
> and return a tlink with an incorrect session than
> the lease break was intended for. As a result, the breaks
> may be ACKed through an incorrect session.
>
> While it seems that Samba/Windows Servers 2016-2025 ignore this as long as
> the lease key is correct, we ran into a case where if you're using
> NetApp ONTAP or Azure NetApp Files they will reject the ACK
> and return `STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED` errors on any future read requests
> a user may initiate through their still held open file handle,
> and the server will eventually close the file.
>
> In the dmesg logs, the user may see errors like these:
>
> CIFS: Status code returned 0xc0000128 STATUS_FILE_CLOSED
> CIFS: VFS: Send error in read = -9
>
> With a multiuser mount using NetApp, this issue is really easy
> for users to hit on a wide variety of kernel versions
> by attempting to copy a file from the share
> to the local machine through GNOME Files/Nautilus.
> This copy will always result in Nautilus throwing
> a `Bad File Descriptor` error to the user and fail.
> With this fix, you can copy files through Nautilus without issue.
>
> From looking at the traces, it seems that glib will
> open the file first, and call listxattr before actually attempting
> to copy the file data. The listxattr call always triggers a break,
> causing the copy to fail.
>
> The proposed fix returns to the way the client grabbed the tlink before
> commit e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break").
>
> The bulk of that commit (checking for list empty) remains untouched, and
> I think the change to using cifs_sb_tlink was intended to avoid a
> NULL/ERR deference on the tlink as well as update the reference count.
>
> I believe this fix should preserve those safety properties, but of course
> I'd appreciate any corrections here.
>
> Fixes: e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: April Cardenas <april.cardenas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts
2026-09-10 5:16 [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts April Cardenas
2026-09-11 1:04 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2026-09-11 12:31 ` Bharath SM
2026-09-11 19:28 ` Paulo Alcantara
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bharath SM @ 2026-09-11 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: April Cardenas
Cc: linux-cifs, pc, linkinjeon, ronniesahlberg, sprasad, tom,
bharathsm, samba-technical, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 5:17 AM April Cardenas
<april.cardenas@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, when cifs_oplock_break handles a break request from the server
> it searches for the appropriate tlink to handle the request
> but incorrectly uses the current fsuid as the search key, eventually
> causing read errors for users with multiuser mounts on NetApp.
> Fix this by using the tlink from the cfile struct instead to respond
> through the correct session.
>
> As breaks are handled in a worker thread, the current fsuid
> isn't guaranteed to match the session that the break is intended for.
> This means that cifs_sb_tlink may search the rbtree using the wrong fsuid,
> and return a tlink with an incorrect session than
> the lease break was intended for. As a result, the breaks
> may be ACKed through an incorrect session.
>
> While it seems that Samba/Windows Servers 2016-2025 ignore this as long as
> the lease key is correct, we ran into a case where if you're using
> NetApp ONTAP or Azure NetApp Files they will reject the ACK
> and return `STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED` errors on any future read requests
> a user may initiate through their still held open file handle,
> and the server will eventually close the file.
>
> In the dmesg logs, the user may see errors like these:
>
> CIFS: Status code returned 0xc0000128 STATUS_FILE_CLOSED
> CIFS: VFS: Send error in read = -9
>
> With a multiuser mount using NetApp, this issue is really easy
> for users to hit on a wide variety of kernel versions
> by attempting to copy a file from the share
> to the local machine through GNOME Files/Nautilus.
> This copy will always result in Nautilus throwing
> a `Bad File Descriptor` error to the user and fail.
> With this fix, you can copy files through Nautilus without issue.
>
> From looking at the traces, it seems that glib will
> open the file first, and call listxattr before actually attempting
> to copy the file data. The listxattr call always triggers a break,
> causing the copy to fail.
>
> The proposed fix returns to the way the client grabbed the tlink before
> commit e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break").
>
> The bulk of that commit (checking for list empty) remains untouched, and
> I think the change to using cifs_sb_tlink was intended to avoid a
> NULL/ERR deference on the tlink as well as update the reference count.
>
> I believe this fix should preserve those safety properties, but of course
> I'd appreciate any corrections here.
>
> Fixes: e8f5f849ffce2 ("cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: April Cardenas <april.cardenas@canonical.com>
> ---
> fs/smb/client/file.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/smb/client/file.c b/fs/smb/client/file.c
> index 1aa4844f8b8a..0d428517f454 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/client/file.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/client/file.c
> @@ -3354,8 +3354,8 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
> wait_on_bit(&cinode->flags, CIFS_INODE_PENDING_WRITERS,
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> - tlink = cifs_sb_tlink(cifs_sb);
> - if (IS_ERR(tlink)) {
> + tlink = cifs_get_tlink(cfile->tlink);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tlink)) {
> /* drop the reference taken when the break was queued */
> _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */, false);
> goto out;
LGTM. Reviewed-by: Bharath S M <bharathsm@microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts
2026-09-10 5:16 [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts April Cardenas
2026-09-11 1:04 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-09-11 12:31 ` Bharath SM
@ 2026-09-11 19:28 ` Paulo Alcantara
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Alcantara @ 2026-09-11 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: April Cardenas, linux-cifs
Cc: linkinjeon, ronniesahlberg, sprasad, tom, bharathsm,
samba-technical, linux-kernel, April Cardenas, stable
April Cardenas <april.cardenas@canonical.com> writes:
> Currently, when cifs_oplock_break handles a break request from the server
> it searches for the appropriate tlink to handle the request
> but incorrectly uses the current fsuid as the search key, eventually
> causing read errors for users with multiuser mounts on NetApp.
> Fix this by using the tlink from the cfile struct instead to respond
> through the correct session.
> ...
Applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-10 5:16 [PATCH] smb/client: send lease break ACKs thru correct session for multiuser mounts April Cardenas
2026-09-11 1:04 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-09-11 12:31 ` Bharath SM
2026-09-11 19:28 ` Paulo Alcantara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®