mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <quadros.roger@gmail.com>,
	lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Add GPIO enable control to fixed voltage  regulator driver
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:25:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74d0deb30907310625u128ea22cu6fecca53c4a23d40@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090731131005.GE17091@sirena.org.uk>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Mark
Brown<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:55:18PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> Looks good, some relatively nitpicky issues:
>
>> +     int use_gpio_control;
>
> This isn't needed, just use an invalid GPIO value (zero or less).

Negative only, actually. Zero itself is a valid GPIO number (which is
a bit unfortunate because if you forget to initialize .gpio, it will
default to GPIO #0).

If you drop .use_gpio_control, use gpio_is_valid(data->gpio) for this check:

>> +       if (data->use_gpio_control) {
>> +               gpio_set_value(data->gpio,
>> +                               data->enable_high ? 1 : 0);
>
> Nicer to use the _cansleep() variants in case the GPIO is one on an
> I2C/SPI device of some kind.  The regulator API doesn't mind if drivers
> sleep so long as they don't do so excessively and it's not normally
> sufficiently performance critical to make the inlining worth it.
>
>> +             if (ret) {
>> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not obtain regulator " \
>> +                                     "enable GPIO %d\n", config->gpio);
>
> Please do something like:
>
>        dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>                "Could not obtain enable GPIO %d: %d\n",
>                config->gpio, ret);
>
> so that the error message is all in one in the source (so it's easier to
> find when grepping the kernel log.  You also don't need the \.
>
>> +                     goto err_name;
>> +             } else {
>
> No need for the else clause; you've got the goto above.
>
>> +                     ret = gpio_direction_output(config->gpio,
>> +                             config->enable_high ? 0 : 1);
>> +                     if (ret) {
>> +                             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not configure " \
>> +                                     "enable GPIO %d direction\n",
>> +                                     config->gpio);
>> +                             gpio_free(config->gpio);
>> +                             goto err_name;
>> +                     }
>
> Same comment as above with regard to the error message.  It would be
> nice to have the default state passed in as platform data if you can't
> read it back to help avoid bouncing supplies at startup.  IIRC
> gpio_get_value() will generally take a good stab at giving the current
> state no matter if the GPIO is input our output but I'd need to check.

I think this is not clearly defined in the GPIO API document, so it
could be architecture dependent.

>> +       int use_gpio_control;   /* Use GPIO enable control */
>> +       int gpio;               /* GPIO to use for enable control */
>> +
>> +       int enable_high;        /* Polarity of enable GPIO
>> +                                * 1 = Active High, 0 = Active Low
>
> If you mark the comments with /** they'll get picked up by kerneldoc.

Maybe following the style in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
would be worthwhile, then.

regards
Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-31 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-31 12:55 Roger Quadros
2009-07-31 13:10 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-31 13:25   ` pHilipp Zabel [this message]
2009-07-31 13:34     ` Mark Brown
2009-07-31 13:43       ` Roger Quadros
2009-07-31 13:50         ` Mark Brown
     [not found]           ` <b90c0690907310713w5c8b7fe3l4253f03f78f06491@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <20090731141547.GA6505@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
2009-07-31 14:22               ` Roger Quadros
2009-07-31 14:34                 ` Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74d0deb30907310625u128ea22cu6fecca53c4a23d40@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=quadros.roger@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®