From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, tomas.winkler@intel.com, cang@codeaurora.org,
daejun7.park@samsung.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:23:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7504ebe7163c1aeb14fb52914a51d603ec0ff796.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fbe22f1-d216-3841-62c3-675dcb8b6e8d@acm.org>
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 11:20 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/18/22 11:16, Bean Huo wrote:
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> >
> > LUs with WB potential support are properly checked in
> > ufshcd_wb_probe()
> > before calling ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(), so remove this
> > unnecessary
> > if-checkup in ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun() to match its function
> > definition.
>
> Hi Bean,
>
> Does this patch differ from a revert of Jaegeuk's patch? If not,
> please
> change the patch title into "Revert scsi: ufs: WB is only available
> on
> LUN #0 to #7" and add "Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>" just
> above
> the Signed-off-by line.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Bart,
no difference, I will change its title and CC Jaegeuk.
thanks,
Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 18:16 [PATCH v3 0/3] Changes for ufshcd.c Bean Huo
2022-10-18 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement Bean Huo
2022-10-18 18:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 18:23 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2022-10-18 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc() Bean Huo
2022-10-18 18:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-22 21:30 ` Bean Huo
2022-10-18 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Use is_visible to control UFS unit descriptor sysfs nodes Bean Huo
2022-10-18 18:23 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7504ebe7163c1aeb14fb52914a51d603ec0ff796.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®