* Re: [PATCH 2/2] [2/2] extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function
@ 2012-08-31 7:59 MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2012-08-31 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anish kumar, 최찬우; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 1489 bytes --]
> From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
>
> Rather than re-inventing the wheel we can use the hamming function
> to calculate the number of bits set to check for violation of
> exclusivity.
>
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
Ah.. we've got such a convinient one. Thanks.
Singed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> index e09a6c3..06df95a 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> @@ -89,17 +89,13 @@ static int check_mutually_exclusive(struct extcon_dev *edev, u32 new_state)
> return 0;
>
> for (i = 0; edev->mutually_exclusive[i]; i++) {
> - int count = 0, j;
> + int weight;
> u32 correspondants = new_state & edev->mutually_exclusive[i];
> - u32 exp = 1;
> -
> - for (j = 0; j < 32; j++) {
> - if (exp & correspondants)
> - count++;
> - if (count > 1)
> - return i + 1;
> - exp <<= 1;
> - }
> +
> + /* calculate the total number of bits set */
> + weight = hweight32(correspondants);
> + if (weight > 1)
> + return i + 1;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] [2/2] extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function
2012-08-29 19:05 [PATCH 1/2] [1/2]extcon: standard cable names definition and declaration changed anish kumar
@ 2012-08-29 19:05 ` anish kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: anish kumar @ 2012-08-29 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cw00.choi, myungjoo.ham; +Cc: linux-kernel, anish kumar
From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
Rather than re-inventing the wheel we can use the hamming function
to calculate the number of bits set to check for violation of
exclusivity.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
---
drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 14 +++++---------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
index e09a6c3..06df95a 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
@@ -89,17 +89,13 @@ static int check_mutually_exclusive(struct extcon_dev *edev, u32 new_state)
return 0;
for (i = 0; edev->mutually_exclusive[i]; i++) {
- int count = 0, j;
+ int weight;
u32 correspondants = new_state & edev->mutually_exclusive[i];
- u32 exp = 1;
-
- for (j = 0; j < 32; j++) {
- if (exp & correspondants)
- count++;
- if (count > 1)
- return i + 1;
- exp <<= 1;
- }
+
+ /* calculate the total number of bits set */
+ weight = hweight32(correspondants);
+ if (weight > 1)
+ return i + 1;
}
return 0;
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-31 7:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-31 7:59 [PATCH 2/2] [2/2] extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function MyungJoo Ham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-29 19:05 [PATCH 1/2] [1/2]extcon: standard cable names definition and declaration changed anish kumar
2012-08-29 19:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] [2/2] extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function anish kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome