From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com,
sagis@google.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL error printing for module initialization
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:45:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7523faad-23f0-2fcb-30e3-b0207d71e63f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b9ddfb377a944393b2a93f963cd902232a5ee33.1692962263.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
On 25.08.23 г. 15:14 ч., Kai Huang wrote:
> TDX module initialization is essentially to make a set of SEAMCALL leafs
> to complete a state machine involving multiple states. These SEAMCALLs
> are not expected to fail. In fact, they are not expected to return any
> non-zero code (except the "running out of entropy error", which can be
> handled internally already).
>
> Add yet another layer of SEAMCALL wrappers, which treats all non-zero
> return code as error, to support printing SEAMCALL error upon failure
> for module initialization.
>
> Other SEAMCALLs may treat some specific error codes as legal (e.g., some
> can return BUSY legally and expect the caller to retry). The caller can
> use the wrappers w/o error printing for those cases. The new wrappers
> can also be improved to suit those cases. Leave this as future work.
>
> SEAMCALL can also return kernel defined error codes for three special
> cases: 1) TDX isn't enabled by the BIOS; 2) TDX module isn't loaded; 3)
> CPU isn't in VMX operation. The first case isn't expected (unless BIOS
> bug, etc) because SEAMCALL is only expected to be made when the kernel
> detects TDX is enabled. The second case is only expected to be legal
> for the very first SEAMCALL during module initialization. The third
> case can be legal for any SEAMCALL leaf because VMX can be disabled due
> to emergency reboot.
>
> Also add wrappers to convert the SEAMCALL error code to the kernel error
> code so that each caller doesn't have to repeat. Blindly print error
> for the above special cases to save the effort to optimize them.
>
> TDX module can only be initialized once during its life cycle, but the
> module can be runtime updated by the kernel (not yet supported). After
> module runtime update, the kernel needs to initialize it again. Use
> pr_err() to print SEAMCALL error for module initialization, because if
> using pr_err_once() the SEAMCALL error during module initialization
> won't be printed after module runtime update.
>
> At last, for now implement those wrappers in tdx.c but they can be moved
> to <asm/tdx.h> when needed. They are implemented with intention to be
> shared by other kernel components. After all, in most cases, SEAMCALL
> failure is unexpected and the caller just wants to print.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v12 -> v13:
> - New implementation due to TDCALL assembly series.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> index cfae8b31a2e9..3b248c94a4a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> /*
> * TDX module SEAMCALL leaf function error codes
> */
> +#define TDX_SUCCESS 0ULL
> #define TDX_RND_NO_ENTROPY 0x8000020300000000ULL
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index 908590e85749..bb63cb7361c8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,90 @@
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/tdx.h>
>
> +#define seamcall_err(__fn, __err, __args, __prerr_func) \
> + __prerr_func("SEAMCALL (0x%llx) failed: 0x%llx\n", \
> + ((u64)__fn), ((u64)__err))
> +
> +#define SEAMCALL_REGS_FMT \
> + "RCX 0x%llx RDX 0x%llx R8 0x%llx R9 0x%llx R10 0x%llx R11 0x%llx\n"
> +
> +#define seamcall_err_ret(__fn, __err, __args, __prerr_func) \
> +({ \
> + seamcall_err((__fn), (__err), (__args), __prerr_func); \
> + __prerr_func(SEAMCALL_REGS_FMT, \
> + (__args)->rcx, (__args)->rdx, (__args)->r8, \
> + (__args)->r9, (__args)->r10, (__args)->r11); \
> +})
> +
> +#define SEAMCALL_EXTRA_REGS_FMT \
> + "RBX 0x%llx RDI 0x%llx RSI 0x%llx R12 0x%llx R13 0x%llx R14 0x%llx R15 0x%llx"
> +
> +#define seamcall_err_saved_ret(__fn, __err, __args, __prerr_func) \
> +({ \
> + seamcall_err_ret(__fn, __err, __args, __prerr_func); \
> + __prerr_func(SEAMCALL_EXTRA_REGS_FMT, \
> + (__args)->rbx, (__args)->rdi, (__args)->rsi, \
> + (__args)->r12, (__args)->r13, (__args)->r14, \
> + (__args)->r15); \
> +})
> +
> +static __always_inline bool seamcall_err_is_kernel_defined(u64 err)
> +{
> + /* All kernel defined SEAMCALL error code have TDX_SW_ERROR set */
> + return (err & TDX_SW_ERROR) == TDX_SW_ERROR;
> +}
> +
> +#define __SEAMCALL_PRERR(__seamcall_func, __fn, __args, __seamcall_err_func, \
> + __prerr_func) \
> +({ \
> + u64 ___sret = __seamcall_func((__fn), (__args)); \
> + \
> + /* Kernel defined error code has special meaning, leave to caller */ \
> + if (!seamcall_err_is_kernel_defined((___sret)) && \
> + ___sret != TDX_SUCCESS) \
> + __seamcall_err_func((__fn), (___sret), (__args), __prerr_func); \
> + \
> + ___sret; \
> +})
> +
> +#define SEAMCALL_PRERR(__seamcall_func, __fn, __args, __seamcall_err_func) \
> +({ \
> + u64 ___sret = __SEAMCALL_PRERR(__seamcall_func, __fn, __args, \
> + __seamcall_err_func, pr_err);
__SEAMCALL_PRERR seems to only ever be called with pr_err for as the
error function, can you just kill off that argument and always call pr_err.
\
> + int ___ret; \
> + \
> + switch (___sret) { \
> + case TDX_SUCCESS: \
> + ___ret = 0; \
> + break; \
> + case TDX_SEAMCALL_VMFAILINVALID: \
> + pr_err("SEAMCALL failed: TDX module not loaded.\n"); \
> + ___ret = -ENODEV; \
> + break; \
> + case TDX_SEAMCALL_GP: \
> + pr_err("SEAMCALL failed: TDX disabled by BIOS.\n"); \
> + ___ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; \
> + break; \
> + case TDX_SEAMCALL_UD: \
> + pr_err("SEAMCALL failed: CPU not in VMX operation.\n"); \
> + ___ret = -EACCES; \
> + break; \
> + default: \
> + ___ret = -EIO; \
> + } \
> + ___ret; \
> +})
> +
> +#define seamcall_prerr(__fn, __args) \
> + SEAMCALL_PRERR(seamcall, (__fn), (__args), seamcall_err)
> +
> +#define seamcall_prerr_ret(__fn, __args) \
> + SEAMCALL_PRERR(seamcall_ret, (__fn), (__args), seamcall_err_ret)
> +
> +#define seamcall_prerr_saved_ret(__fn, __args) \
> + SEAMCALL_PRERR(seamcall_saved_ret, (__fn), (__args), \
> + seamcall_err_saved_ret)
The level of indirection which you add with those seamcal_err* function
is just mind boggling:
SEAMCALL_PRERR -> __SEAMCALL_PRERR -> __seamcall_err_func ->
__prerr_func and all of this so you can have a standardized string
printing. I see no value in having __SEAMCALL_PRERR as a separate macro,
simply inline it into SEAMCALL_PRERR, replace the prerr_func argument
with a direct call to pr_err.
> +
> static u32 tdx_global_keyid __ro_after_init;
> static u32 tdx_guest_keyid_start __ro_after_init;
> static u32 tdx_nr_guest_keyids __ro_after_init;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 12:14 [PATCH v13 00/22] TDX host kernel support Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 01/22] x86/virt/tdx: Detect TDX during kernel boot Kai Huang
2023-09-08 15:19 ` Dave Hansen
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 02/22] x86/tdx: Define TDX supported page sizes as macros Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 03/22] x86/virt/tdx: Make INTEL_TDX_HOST depend on X86_X2APIC Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 04/22] x86/cpu: Detect TDX partial write machine check erratum Kai Huang
2023-09-08 15:22 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-11 12:39 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Handle SEAMCALL no entropy error in common code Kai Huang
2023-09-08 16:21 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-11 11:41 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 06/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL error printing for module initialization Kai Huang
2023-09-07 12:45 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2023-09-08 10:33 ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-08 10:38 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-09-08 11:00 ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-08 16:31 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-11 12:07 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 07/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add skeleton to enable TDX on demand Kai Huang
2023-09-07 14:19 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-09-08 10:16 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 08/22] x86/virt/tdx: Get information about TDX module and TDX-capable memory Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 09/22] x86/virt/tdx: Use all system memory when initializing TDX module as TDX memory Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 10/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 11/22] x86/virt/tdx: Fill out " Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 12/22] x86/virt/tdx: Allocate and set up PAMTs for TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 13/22] x86/virt/tdx: Designate reserved areas for all TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 14/22] x86/virt/tdx: Configure TDX module with the TDMRs and global KeyID Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 15/22] x86/virt/tdx: Configure global KeyID on all packages Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 16/22] x86/virt/tdx: Initialize all TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 17/22] x86/kexec: Flush cache of TDX private memory Kai Huang
2023-09-15 17:43 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-09-15 17:50 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-18 12:08 ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-18 15:44 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-18 22:14 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 18/22] x86/virt/tdx: Keep TDMRs when module initialization is successful Kai Huang
2023-09-15 23:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-09-15 23:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 19/22] x86/virt/tdx: Improve readibility of module initialization error handling Kai Huang
2023-09-15 23:14 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 20/22] x86/kexec(): Reset TDX private memory on platforms with TDX erratum Kai Huang
2023-09-14 21:36 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-09-15 11:42 ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-15 16:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-09-18 4:36 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 21/22] x86/mce: Improve error log of kernel space TDX #MC due to erratum Kai Huang
2023-08-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v13 22/22] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for TDX host support Kai Huang
2023-09-11 11:32 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-09-13 11:27 ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-28 7:48 ` [PATCH v13 00/22] TDX host kernel support Nikolay Borisov
2023-09-28 10:19 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7523faad-23f0-2fcb-30e3-b0207d71e63f@suse.com \
--to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®