[PATCH v2] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[PATCH v2] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Johannes Thumshirn]

With drivers that are settting a virtual boundary constrain, we are
seeing a lot of bio splitting and smaller I/Os being submitted to the
driver.

This happens because the bio gap detection code does not account cases
where PAGE_SIZE - 1 is bigger than queue_virt_boundary() and thus will
split the bio unnecessarily.

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

---
Changes to v1:
* Tried to re-phrase the commit message
* Add reviews
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 2 +-
 block/blk.h       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 6b5ad275ed56..208658a901c6 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline bool bio_will_gap(struct request_queue *q,
 		bio_get_first_bvec(prev_rq->bio, &pb);
 	else
 		bio_get_first_bvec(prev, &pb);
-	if (pb.bv_offset)
+	if (pb.bv_offset & queue_virt_boundary(q))
 		return true;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index a1841b8ff129..c85e53f21cdd 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline bool biovec_phys_mergeable(struct request_queue *q,
 static inline bool __bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
 		struct bio_vec *bprv, unsigned int offset)
 {
-	return offset ||
+	return (offset & queue_virt_boundary(q)) ||
 		((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
 }
 
-- 
2.16.4

Re: [PATCH v2] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Sagi Grimberg]

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>

Re: [PATCH v2] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/7/18 6:58 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> With drivers that are settting a virtual boundary constrain, we are
> seeing a lot of bio splitting and smaller I/Os being submitted to the
> driver.
> 
> This happens because the bio gap detection code does not account cases
> where PAGE_SIZE - 1 is bigger than queue_virt_boundary() and thus will
> split the bio unnecessarily.

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH v2] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/7/18 6:58 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> With drivers that are settting a virtual boundary constrain, we are
> seeing a lot of bio splitting and smaller I/Os being submitted to the
> driver.
> 
> This happens because the bio gap detection code does not account cases
> where PAGE_SIZE - 1 is bigger than queue_virt_boundary() and thus will
> split the bio unnecessarily.

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe