mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
@ 2008-06-27 18:13 dougthompson
  2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: dougthompson @ 2008-06-27 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel, akpm

From:	Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>

Applied to linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3

Patch file for the i5100_edac module

Explicitly unmask ECC errors we are interested in reporting.

Signed-off-by:	Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Signed-off-by:	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
---
 drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc5.orig/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc5/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
 #define		I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a)  ((a) & I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY_MASK)
 #define	I5100_NERR_NF_MEM	0xa4	/* MC Next Non-Fatal Errors */
 #define		I5100_NERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a)  I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a)
+#define I5100_EMASK_MEM		0xa8	/* MC Error Mask Register */
 
 /* device 21 and 22, func 0 */
 #define I5100_MTR_0	0x154	/* Memory Technology Registers 0-3 */
@@ -709,6 +710,11 @@ static int __devinit i5100_init_one(stru
 		goto bail;
 	}
 
+	/* enable error reporting... */
+	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, I5100_EMASK_MEM, &dw);
+	dw &= ~I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY_MASK;
+	pci_write_config_dword(pdev, I5100_EMASK_MEM, dw);
+
 	/* device 21, func 0, Channel 0 Memory Map, Error Flag/Mask, etc... */
 	ch0mm = pci_get_device_func(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
 				    PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5100_21, 0);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
  2008-06-27 18:13 [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits dougthompson
@ 2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
  2008-06-28  3:40   ` Doug Thompson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-06-27 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dougthompson; +Cc: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel

So... is there any reason why we shouldn't fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into #1?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
  2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-06-28  3:40   ` Doug Thompson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Doug Thompson @ 2008-06-28  3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, dougthompson; +Cc: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel


--- Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> So... is there any reason why we shouldn't fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into #1?
> 

I pondered that myself. I suppose since it is a new driver, then those mods could be folded in. I
got the original sometime ago and received the updates over time, as I let it stew for awhile,
expecting some updates. 

They could be folded together, yes

doug t


W1DUG

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-28  3:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-27 18:13 [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits dougthompson
2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-28  3:40   ` Doug Thompson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®