* [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
@ 2008-06-27 18:13 dougthompson
2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: dougthompson @ 2008-06-27 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel, akpm
From: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Applied to linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3
Patch file for the i5100_edac module
Explicitly unmask ECC errors we are interested in reporting.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
---
drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc5.orig/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc5/drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
#define I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a) ((a) & I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY_MASK)
#define I5100_NERR_NF_MEM 0xa4 /* MC Next Non-Fatal Errors */
#define I5100_NERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a) I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY(a)
+#define I5100_EMASK_MEM 0xa8 /* MC Error Mask Register */
/* device 21 and 22, func 0 */
#define I5100_MTR_0 0x154 /* Memory Technology Registers 0-3 */
@@ -709,6 +710,11 @@ static int __devinit i5100_init_one(stru
goto bail;
}
+ /* enable error reporting... */
+ pci_read_config_dword(pdev, I5100_EMASK_MEM, &dw);
+ dw &= ~I5100_FERR_NF_MEM_ANY_MASK;
+ pci_write_config_dword(pdev, I5100_EMASK_MEM, dw);
+
/* device 21, func 0, Channel 0 Memory Map, Error Flag/Mask, etc... */
ch0mm = pci_get_device_func(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5100_21, 0);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
2008-06-27 18:13 [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits dougthompson
@ 2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-28 3:40 ` Doug Thompson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-06-27 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dougthompson; +Cc: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel
So... is there any reason why we shouldn't fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into #1?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits
2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-06-28 3:40 ` Doug Thompson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Doug Thompson @ 2008-06-28 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, dougthompson; +Cc: bluesmoke-devel, linux-kernel
--- Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> So... is there any reason why we shouldn't fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into #1?
>
I pondered that myself. I suppose since it is a new driver, then those mods could be folded in. I
got the original sometime ago and received the updates over time, as I let it stew for awhile,
expecting some updates.
They could be folded together, yes
doug t
W1DUG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-28 3:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-27 18:13 [PATCH 4/13] EDAC i5100 fix unmask ecc bits dougthompson
2008-06-27 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-28 3:40 ` Doug Thompson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®