From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:57:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <763825a2-67a1-6288-1b12-15768eef1d75@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxed5u9X2PKGAKGf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 9/7/22 00:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
>> #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS 0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>> #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID 0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>>
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
>> +
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
>> + == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
>
>
> That's not half tedious...
>
> How about something like so?
Makes sense, will fold this back. Could I also include your "Signed-off-by:"
for this patch ?
- Anshuman
>
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
> return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
> }
>
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val) \
> + PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
> +
> /*
> * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT 0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST 0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW 0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW 0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW 0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL 0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC 0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> -
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT 0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD 0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS 0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT 0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR 0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT 0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN 0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT 0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS 0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID 0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
> +enum {
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +};
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
> +
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val) \
> + static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) == \
> + PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
> +
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
>
> static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +
> +/*
> + * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> + */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT, 0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST, 0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW, 0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW, 0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW, 0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL, 0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> +PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC, 0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> + /* 0x00080 */
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT, 0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
> +PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD, 0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> +PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS, 0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT, 0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PAIR, 0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> +PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT, 0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> +PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN, 0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT, 0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS, 0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID, 0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-05 5:42 [PATCH V2 0/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH is followed Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 9:10 ` James Clark
2022-09-06 2:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 5:27 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2022-09-07 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=763825a2-67a1-6288-1b12-15768eef1d75@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®