From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:22:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxed5u9X2PKGAKGf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220905054239.324029-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
> #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS 0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID 0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
> +
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
> + == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
That's not half tedious...
How about something like so?
---
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
}
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val) \
+ PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
+
/*
* struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
*/
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT 0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST 0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW 0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW 0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW 0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL 0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC 0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
-
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT 0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD 0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS 0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT 0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR 0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT 0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN 0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT 0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS 0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID 0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
+enum {
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+};
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
+
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val) \
+ static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) == \
+ PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
+
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
{
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+
+/*
+ * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
+ */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT, 0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST, 0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW, 0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW, 0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW, 0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL, 0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
+PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC, 0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
+ /* 0x00080 */
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT, 0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
+PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD, 0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
+PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS, 0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT, 0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PAIR, 0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
+PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT, 0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
+PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN, 0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT, 0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS, 0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID, 0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-06 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-05 5:42 [PATCH V2 0/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH is followed Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 9:10 ` James Clark
2022-09-06 2:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05 5:42 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-09-07 5:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yxed5u9X2PKGAKGf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®