mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: Fix 32-bit compatible userspace write size overflow error
@ 2023-11-15 10:56 Jinjie Ruan
  2023-11-16  4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan @ 2023-11-15 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
	Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin
  Cc: ruanjinjie

For 32-bit compatible userspace program, write with size = -1 return not
-1 but unexpected other values, which is due to the __access_ok() check is
insufficient. The specified "ptr + size" is greater than 32-bit limit and
should return -EFAULT, but it is not checked and can not catch the overflow
error.

Fix above error by checking 32-bit limit if it is 32-bit compatible
userspace program.

How to reproduce:

The test program is as below:

root@syzkaller:~# cat test.c
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <fcntl.h>
	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <stdint.h>
	#include <stdlib.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	#define pinfo(fmt, args...) \
	    fprintf(stderr, "[INFO][%s][%d][%s]:"fmt, \
	    __FILE__,__LINE__,__func__,##args)

	#undef SIZE_MAX
	#define SIZE_MAX -1

	int main()
	{
	    char wbuf[3] = { 'x', 'y', 'z' };
	    char *path = "write.tmp";
	    int ret;

	    int fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
	    if (fd<0)
	    {
	        pinfo("fd=%d\n", fd);
	        exit(-1);
	    }

	    assert(write(fd, wbuf, 3) == 3);

	    ret = write (fd, wbuf, SIZE_MAX);
	    pinfo("ret=%d\n", ret);
	    pinfo("size_max=%d\n",SIZE_MAX);
	    assert(ret==-1);
	    close(fd);
	    pinfo("INFO: end\n");

	    return 0;
	}

Before applying this patch, userspace 32-bit program return 3799 if the
write size = -1 as below:
	root@syzkaller:~# gcc test.c -o test
	root@syzkaller:~# gcc -m32 test.c -o test32
	root@syzkaller:~# ./test
	[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
	[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
	[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end
	root@syzkaller:~# ./test32
	[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=3799
	[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
	test32: test.c:34: main: Assertion `ret==-1' failed.
	Aborted

After applying this patch, userspace 32-bit program return -1 if the write
size = -1 as expected as below:
	root@syzkaller:~# gcc test.c -o test
	root@syzkaller:~# gcc -m32 test.c -o test32
	root@syzkaller:~# ./test
	[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
	[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
	[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end
	root@syzkaller:~# ./test32
	[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
	[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
	[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end

Fixes: b9bd9f605c4a ("x86: uaccess: move 32-bit and 64-bit parts into proper <asm/uaccess_N.h> header")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index f2c02e4469cc..9febfbca3a88 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ static inline bool __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
 		return valid_user_address(ptr);
 	} else {
 		unsigned long sum = size + (unsigned long)ptr;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+		if (in_ia32_syscall())
+			return valid_user_address(sum) &&
+			sum >= (unsigned long)ptr && sum < UL(0x100000000);
+#endif
 		return valid_user_address(sum) && sum >= (unsigned long)ptr;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-16  4:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-15 10:56 [PATCH] x86: Fix 32-bit compatible userspace write size overflow error Jinjie Ruan
2023-11-16  4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®