From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <771950784.20140211165215@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210195402.GA3924@kernel.dk>
Hi Konrad,
Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on top of it .. and I encoutered this one:
[ 438.029756] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[ 438.029759] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[ 438.029760] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 438.029770] CPU: 3 PID: 9593 Comm: blkback.2.xvda Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc2-20140211-pcireset-net-btrevert-xenblock+ #1
[ 438.029773] Hardware name: MSI MS-7640/890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640) , BIOS V1.8B1 09/13/2010
[ 438.029784] ffff88005224c4f0 ffff88004e5d9b68 ffffffff81b808c4 ffff88004ba2b510
[ 438.029791] 0000000000000002 ffff88004e5d9c38 ffffffff81116eab ffff88004e5d9bf8
[ 438.029798] ffffffff81117b35 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff82cee570
[ 438.029799] Call Trace:
[ 438.029815] [<ffffffff81b808c4>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 438.029826] [<ffffffff81116eab>] __lock_acquire+0x1c2b/0x2220
[ 438.029833] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029841] [<ffffffff81117b0d>] lock_acquire+0xbd/0x150
[ 438.029847] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029852] [<ffffffff810e599d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x290
[ 438.029856] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029863] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029872] [<ffffffff816fef01>] ? xen_blkif_schedule+0x1a1/0x8d0
[ 438.029881] [<ffffffff81b8ae0d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6d/0x90
[ 438.029888] [<ffffffff8111392b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfb/0x240
[ 438.029894] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029901] [<ffffffff816fefe9>] xen_blkif_schedule+0x289/0x8d0
[ 438.029907] [<ffffffff8110d510>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[ 438.029913] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029919] [<ffffffff81b8ae21>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x81/0x90
[ 438.029925] [<ffffffff816fed60>] ? xen_blkif_be_int+0x40/0x40
[ 438.029932] [<ffffffff810ee374>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
[ 438.029938] [<ffffffff81b8afe0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[ 438.029946] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[ 438.029951] [<ffffffff81b8c1fc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 438.029958] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
Doesn't seem to serious .. but never the less :-)
--
Sander
Monday, February 10, 2014, 8:54:02 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Hey Jens,
>>
>> Please git pull the following branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git stable/for-jens-3.14
>>
>> which is based off v3.13-rc6. If you would like me to rebase it on
>> a different branch/tag I would be more than happy to do so.
> Older is fine, it's only an issue if you are ahead of the branch you
> want to go into.
dd>>
>> The patches are all bug-fixes and hopefully can go in 3.14.
>>
>> They deal with xen-blkback shutdown and cause memory leaks
>> as well as shutdown races. They should go to stable tree and if you
>> are OK with I will ask them to backport those fixes.
>>
>> There is also a fix to xen-blkfront to deal with unexpected state
>> transition. And lastly a fix to the header where it was using the
>> __aligned__ unnecessarily.
> Pulled!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 18:44 [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-10 19:54 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-11 15:52 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2014-02-11 15:56 ` [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-11 16:07 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 17:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 17:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 18:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 18:21 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 20:21 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-12 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-12 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=771950784.20140211165215@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome