From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"jthoughton@google.com" <jthoughton@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use CMPXCHG when clearing Accessed bit in TDP MMU
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:07:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7722f65f2f60b411fbdafe53406461a1e6d8fc7d.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728002236.869865-2-seanjc@google.com>
On Mon, 2026-07-27 at 17:22 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use LOCK CMPXCHG instead of LOCK AND to clear the Accessed bit when aging
> SPTEs in the TDP MMU, as doing a LOCK AND can corrupt a FROZEN SPTE and
> allow a third CPU to effectively overwrite the FROZEN SPTE. As pointed
> out by AI of some kind, because the magic FROZEN_SPTE value is a "full"
> SPTE, not a single bit, and includes the Accessed bit, clearing the
> Accessed bit in a FROZEN SPTE will result in is_frozen_spte() getting a
> false negative.
>
> E.g. if CPU0 freezes an SPTE, and CPU1 clears the Accessed bitin the frozen
^
bit in
> SPTE, then CPU2 could come along and overwrite the frozen SPTE with a
> shadow-present SPTE.
>
> Thankfully, the false negative is largely benign, because outside of TDX,
> which doesn't support aging, KVM only freezes leaf SPTEs when removing an
> upper level shadow page. So while KVM could clobber a frozen SPTE back to
> a shadow-present SPTE, and could even use the new SPTE, the subsequent TLB
> flush will make the orphaned, shadow-present SPTE unreachable. Failure to
> ever zap the orphaned leaf SPTE would show up in KVM's stats, but otherwise
> is benign (because KVM no longer keeps an elevated refcount for leaf SPTEs).
>
> Opportunistically add a comment to warn future developers away from using
> kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte_atomic() and tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits_atomic(), as
> they are generally unsafe. Keep the helpers, e.g. instead of open-coding
> the atomic64_fetch_and() in tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits(), as scary warnings
> usually are more effective deterrent against recidivism than removal of the
> dangerous code.
>
> Alternatively, KVM could use different bits for the magic FROZEN_SPTE value,
> e.g. setting the Dirty bits (with effective IPAT and Global aliases) would
> likely be "ok", as IPAT/Global are extremely unlikely to be cleared without
> doing a full SPTE write, and KVM's clearing of Dirty bits shares logic with
> Write-Protection, which must do a full SPTE write (via cmpxchg64() in the
> TDP MMU) to ensure KVM isn't clobbering state. But there is zero reason to
> carry that risk (beyond stubbornness in wanting to preserve a "cute" idea),
> as the cost of LOCK CMPXCHG and LOCK AND are within 1-2 uops of each other
> on modern hardware.
>
> Fixes: b146a9b34aed ("KVM: x86/mmu: Age TDP MMU SPTEs without holding mmu_lock")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 0:22 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use LOCK CMPXCHG to clear Accessed bits Sean Christopherson
2026-07-28 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use CMPXCHG when clearing Accessed bit in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2026-07-28 0:31 ` James Houghton
2026-07-29 11:07 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2026-07-28 0:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use CMPXCHG when clearing Accessed bit in the shadow MMU Sean Christopherson
2026-07-28 0:34 ` James Houghton
2026-07-29 11:10 ` Huang, Kai
2026-07-29 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use LOCK CMPXCHG to clear Accessed bits Huang, Kai
2026-07-29 13:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-29 22:04 ` Huang, Kai
2026-07-31 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7722f65f2f60b411fbdafe53406461a1e6d8fc7d.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome