From: Kundan Kumar <kundan.kumar@samsung.com>
To: wangyufei <wangyufei@vivo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - MISC" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"open list:PAGE CACHE" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: anuj20.g@samsung.com, hch@lst.de, bernd@bsbernd.com,
djwong@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, opensource.kernel@vivo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] writeback: add sysfs to config the number of writeback contexts
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:29:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77291508-cd85-4889-8502-73eb834e543c@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825122931.13037-1-wangyufei@vivo.com>
On 8/25/2025 5:59 PM, wangyufei wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We've been interested in this patch about parallelizing writeback [1]
> and have been following its discussion and development. Our testing in
> several application scenarios on mobile devices has shown significant
> performance improvements.
>
Hi,
Thanks for sharing this work.
Could you clarify a few details about your test setup?
- Which filesystem did you run these experiments on?
- What were the specifics of the workload (number of threads, block size,
I/O size)?
- If you are using fio, can you please share the fio command.
- How much RAM was available on the test system?
- Can you share the performance improvement numbers you observed?
That would help in understanding the impact of parallel writeback?
I made similar modifications to dynamically configure the number of
writeback threads in this experimental patch. Refer to patches 14 and 15:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250807045706.2848-1-kundan.kumar@samsung.com/
The key difference is that this change also enables a reduction in the
number of writeback threads.
Thanks,
Kundan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250825123009epcas5p1573496e2cad2f58d22036493e5af03be@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-08-25 12:29 ` wangyufei
2025-08-25 12:29 ` [RFC 1/1] " wangyufei
2025-08-25 14:46 ` [RFC 0/1] " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-29 8:59 ` Kundan Kumar [this message]
2025-09-02 11:19 ` wangyufei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77291508-cd85-4889-8502-73eb834e543c@samsung.com \
--to=kundan.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=opensource.kernel@vivo.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangyufei@vivo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®