mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [niks:has_ioport_v3] [tty] aa0652d7f1: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:03:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <772a05f5f3c1b35864b80bf78429b843bdf14ee9.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c85f0735-6c85-4a6e-ad07-66493783c58e@app.fastmail.com>

On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 13:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, at 12:24, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 09:03 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 
> > Yes that makes sense, it's clearly not correct to put the default case
> > inside CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RT288X. What do you think about going with
> > something like:
> > 
> > @@ -519,9 +534,14 @@ static void set_io_from_upio(struct uart_port *p)
> >  #endif
> > 
> >         default:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> >                 p->serial_in = io_serial_in;
> >                 p->serial_out = io_serial_out;
> >                 break;
> > +#else
> > +               WARN(1, "Unsupported UART type \"io\"\n");
> > +               return;
> > +#endif
> >         }
> 
> I think we have to ensure that ->serial_in() always points
> to some function that doesn't immediately panic, though that
> could be an empty dummy like
> 
>        default:
>                p->serial_in = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) ?
>                       io_serial_in : no_serial_in;
>                p->serial_out = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) ?
>                       io_serial_out : no_serial_out;

Sadly the IS_ENABLED() plus ternary still gives me an undeclared
identifier error for io_serial_in(). So I think we need the more ugly
#ifdef. With that I hope it would then not crash even if one might be
left without any console at all.

> 
> Ideally we'd make mem_serial_in() the default function
> and only use io_serial_in() when UPIO_PORT is selected,
> but that still causes a NULL pointer dereference when
> a platform initializes a 8250 like
> 
> static struct plat_serial8250_port serial_platform_data[] = {
>         {
>                 .iobase         = 0x3f8, /* NULL pointer */
>                 .irq            = IRQ_ISA_UART,
>                 .uartclk        = 1843200,
>         /* default   .iotype         = UPIO_PORT, */
>         },
> 
> so I think an empty function plus a warning is best here.

So in the above case .iotype is implicitly set to 0 which is UPIO_PORT
so I think one could argue it is selected, no? Not sure how picking
UPIO_MEM as default would look like then. One thing we could do though
is make the switch/case more regular like so:

...
#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
	case UPIO_PORT:
		p->serial_in = io_serial_in;
		p->serial_out = io_serial_out;
		break;
#endif

	default:
		WARN(1, "Unsupported UART type %x\n", p->iotype);
		p->serial_in = no_serial_in;
		p->serial_out = no_serial_out;
	}
...

That way we would have to always define no_serial_in() /
no_serial_out() but would also gracefully handle when p->iotype is set
to some other value and it looks relatively clean.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-08 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05  5:54 kernel test robot
2023-01-05  8:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-01-09  8:45   ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-08 11:24   ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-08 12:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-08 14:03       ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=772a05f5f3c1b35864b80bf78429b843bdf14ee9.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®