From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFT][PATCH v1 5/5] cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:29:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7770672.EvYhyI6sBW@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1916668.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When giving up on making a high-confidence prediction,
get_typical_interval() always returns UINT_MAX which means that the
next idle interval prediction will be based entirely on the time till
the next timer. However, the information represented by the most
recent intervals may not be completely useless in those cases.
Namely, the largest recent idle interval is an upper bound on the
recently observed idle duration, so it is reasonable to assume that
the next idle duration is unlikely to exceed it. Moreover, this is
still true after eliminating the suspected outliers if the sample
set still under consideration is at least as large as 50% of the
maximum sample set size.
Accordingly, make get_typical_interval() return the current maximum
recent interval value in that case instead of UINT_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -190,8 +190,19 @@
* This can deal with workloads that have long pauses interspersed
* with sporadic activity with a bunch of short pauses.
*/
- if ((divisor * 4) <= INTERVALS * 3)
+ if (divisor * 4 <= INTERVALS * 3) {
+ /*
+ * If there are sufficiently many data points still under
+ * consideration after the outliers have been eliminated,
+ * returning without a prediction would be a mistake because it
+ * is likely that the next interval will not exceed the current
+ * maximum, so return the latter in that case.
+ */
+ if (divisor >= INTERVALS / 2)
+ return max;
+
return UINT_MAX;
+ }
/* Update the thresholds for the next round. */
if (avg - min > max - avg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 14:21 [RFT][PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information when processing recent idle intervals Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-06 14:22 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 1/5] cpuidle: menu: Drop a redundant local variable Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-06 14:55 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-06 14:24 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 2/5] cpuidle: menu: Use one loop for average and variance computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-17 13:03 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-06 14:25 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 3/5] cpuidle: menu: Tweak threshold use in get_typical_interval() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-17 13:08 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-06 14:26 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 4/5] cpuidle: menu: Eliminate outliers on both ends of the sample set Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-17 13:26 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-06 14:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-02-17 13:39 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 5/5] cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information Christian Loehle
2025-02-17 13:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-04 16:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-05 13:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-05 14:41 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-05 16:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-05 18:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-06 7:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-06 12:48 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-07 14:48 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information when processing recent idle intervals Artem Bityutskiy
2025-02-07 15:24 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-07 15:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-07 15:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-12 21:38 ` Doug Smythies
2025-02-10 14:15 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-10 14:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-10 14:47 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-18 21:17 ` Christian Loehle
2025-02-19 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-14 4:30 ` Doug Smythies
2025-02-14 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-16 16:16 ` Doug Smythies
2025-02-24 6:27 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-02-24 6:38 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-02-24 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-26 4:49 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-02-26 10:54 ` Christian Loehle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7770672.EvYhyI6sBW@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®