From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 00:11:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7A89193C-45D6-4118-87D5-9DC08EBFC11D@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f058290d-b86f-4e05-b7fd-f78c17d6f5bb@intel.com>
> On 4 Jun 2026, at 23:54, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/28/26 08:13, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>> Commit 3db6d5a5ecaf ("x86/mm/tlb: Remove 'struct flush_tlb_info' from the
>> stack") converted flush_tlb_info from stack variable to per-CPU variable.
>> This brought about a performance improvement of around 3% in extreme test.
>
> You've basically (nicely) thrown down the gauntlet and told Nadav that
> his patch or methodology is bad. PeterZ also acked it Nadav's approach.
Dave, why can’t we all be friends. :)
I communicated with Zhou about this. Back when I made my original changes - the
ones Zhou is now editing — I also wanted to keep flush_tlb_info on the stack
with alignment. But PeterZ reverted that [1], because in certain cases (KASAN
with probably some experimental Intel larger cache-line size) the cache-line
alignment made the stack grow too much and triggered warnings.
That's what led us to move flush_tlb_info into a per-cpu struct (preemption
was disabled at that time, so there was no trade-off). Now that Zhou claims
that disabling the preemption is a pain-point, and therefore does not want
to set flush_tlb_info per-cpu, the solution we've landed on is to put it back
on the stack - avoiding the need for a single flush_tlb_info that depends on
preemption being disabled — while limiting the alignment to 64 bytes so the
stack doesn't grow out of control.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/tip-780e0106d468a2962b16b52fdf42898f2639e0a0@git.kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 15:13 [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] smp: Refactor remote CPU selection in smp_call_function_any() Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] smp: Use task-local IPI cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 10:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:48 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 12:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] smp: Alloc percpu csd data in smpcfd_prepare_cpu() only once Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 11:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-04 21:11 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2026-06-04 21:16 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-04 21:21 ` Nadav Amit
2026-06-05 2:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 21:15 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 3:36 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 21:21 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 3:51 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-29 3:22 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-29 6:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7A89193C-45D6-4118-87D5-9DC08EBFC11D@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®