From: "Chuyi Zhou" <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
To: <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <muchun.song@linux.dev>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:22:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25c6dbe4-1f59-4ac0-a9ed-eac0c0be9e97@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c24d821e-2e92-47f0-9124-155010de3f76@paulmck-laptop>
On 2026-05-29 3:47 a.m., Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 11:13:26PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>> Changes in v6:
>> - Make the task-local cpumask selection explicit and drop preemptible()
>> check in smp_call_function_many_cond(). The early put_cpu() decision now
>> depends only on whether a task-local cpumask is available.
>> - Keep smp_task_ipi_mask() private to kernel/smp.c in [PATCH v6 4/12].
>> - Add #include <linux/slab.h> to kernel/smp.c in [PATCH v6 4/12] for
>> kmalloc()/kfree(), fixing the kernel test robot build failure reported
>> at: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605241101.w6T2LApw-lkp@intel.com/
>> - Update the csd_lock_wait() comment in [PATCH v6 6/12].
>> - Add Sebastian's Reviewed-by tags to the reviewed patches.
>
> For the series:
>
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
Thanks Paul, much appreciated!
I will carry your Tested-by tag if I need to post another revision.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 15:13 Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] smp: Refactor remote CPU selection in smp_call_function_any() Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] smp: Use task-local IPI cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 10:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:48 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 12:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] smp: Alloc percpu csd data in smpcfd_prepare_cpu() only once Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-03 11:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-04 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2026-06-04 21:16 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-04 21:21 ` Nadav Amit
2026-06-05 2:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 21:15 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 3:36 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 15:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-04 21:21 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 3:51 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-05-28 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-29 3:22 ` Chuyi Zhou [this message]
2026-05-29 6:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 11:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25c6dbe4-1f59-4ac0-a9ed-eac0c0be9e97@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®