From: "zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
<tj@kernel.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
<chenjun102@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Possible hungtask issue will be introduced with device_lock() in uevent_show()
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:02:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b599394-d1a1-4e13-9c5c-48321172ec65@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024123128-monetize-outtakes-3260@gregkh>
在 2024/12/31 16:26, Greg KH 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 03:56:08PM +0800, Zhang Zekun wrote:
>> Hi, Dan, Greg,
>>
>> We have found a potential tungtask issue has been introduce by commit 9a71892cbcdb ("Revert "driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race""), which revert the rcu in device_uevent but reintroduce the device_lock() in uevent_show(). The reproduce procedure is quite simple:
>
> The revert just puts the original logic back in place, so this is not
> anything new that has been introduced, right? It's just that the
> attempted fix didn't work, so a different fix needs to happen.
Hi, Greg,
Yes, there is nothing new introduced here. We have been testing the rcu
fix (commit 15fffc6a5624 ("driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver
detach race")) for monthes but has not obersved problems.
Noticing that, brmails+k write in bugzilla "Also, I can't say why the
issue appeared in the past even without this commit being present, as I
haven't bisected any kernel version before v6.6.45.". I doubt that there
could still have problem described in bugzilla [1] even if commit
c0a40097f0bc ("drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and
dev_uevent()") has been reverted, and the problem is not directly
introduced by rcu in dev_uevent.
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219244
Thanks,
Zekun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-04 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 21:54 [PATCH v2] driver core: Fix userspace expectations of uevent_show() as a probe barrier Dan Williams
2024-10-07 9:39 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 0:26 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-13 15:00 ` Greg KH
2024-10-28 9:08 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-10-28 22:57 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-29 0:21 ` Greg KH
2024-12-31 7:56 ` Possible hungtask issue will be introduced with device_lock() in uevent_show() Zhang Zekun
2024-12-31 8:26 ` Greg KH
2025-01-04 6:02 ` zhangzekun (A) [this message]
2025-01-04 8:14 ` Greg KH
2025-01-23 2:07 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-27 3:27 ` zhangzekun (A)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b599394-d1a1-4e13-9c5c-48321172ec65@huawei.com \
--to=zhangzekun11@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chenjun102@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®