From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com,
Michael.Roth@amd.com, KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com,
Tycho.Andersen@amd.com, Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:42:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c64d96f-f932-4db9-8119-b9e40d5b7fd9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625150253.GAaj1DHZC8ULg6PzbI@fat_crate.local>
Hello Boris,
On 6/25/2026 10:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 09:56:49PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> +/* Set while SNP has CPU hotplug disabled (kernel-lifetime; survives ccp reload). */
>> +static bool snp_cpu_hotplug_disabled;
>
> Do you really need this?
>
Yes.
cpu_hotplug_disable()/cpu_hotplug_enable() are refcounted (cpu_hotplug_disabled++/--,
with a WARN on underflow), so they have to be balanced. This flag collapses them to
exactly one outstanding disable per SNP-active window, because the disable and enable
sites are not reached a symmetric number of times:
- On firmware without SNP_X86_SHUTDOWN_SUPPORTED, __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() does not
call snp_shutdown() (it's gated on data.x86_snp_shutdown), so SNP stays enabled in
hardware — SNP_EN stays set and hotplug stays disabled — while sev->snp_initialized is
cleared. Re-init after that is routine, the SNP ioctls self-bracket init and shutdown
(e.g. SNP_COMMIT, SNP_SET_CONFIG, SNP_VLEK_LOAD):
if (!sev->snp_initialized)
snp_move_to_init_state(...); /* -> __sev_snp_init_locked -> snp_prepare() */
... SNP_CMD ...
if (shutdown_required)
__sev_snp_shutdown_locked(...);
- So whenever SNP isn't already initialized (psp_init_on_probe off, or after a prior
legacy shutdown), every such ioctl does init -> command -> legacy shutdown. Each init
reaches snp_prepare() with SNP_EN already set, and the disable now sits at the top of
snp_prepare(), so it fires on every cycle. Without this flag that keeps bumping
cpu_hotplug_disabled while the legacy shutdown never re-enables — hotplug ends up stuck
disabled. This flag makes all but the first disable a no-op.
- Also, importantly, kvm-amd module reload on legacy firmware is the same pattern:
unload leaves SNP_EN set, reload re-inits.)
- On the enable side it avoids an unbalanced cpu_hotplug_enable() when the teardown/failure
paths run without an outstanding disable (e.g. shutdown of a never-fully-initialized SNP).
So it's not redundant with cpu_hotplug_disabled — it tracks whether the outstanding disable
belongs to this SNP-active window in this kernel, which keeps the single disable/enable
balanced across the asymmetric legacy-vs-full SNP teardown paths and re-init.
Thanks,
Ashish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1782336473.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-06-25 3:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 5:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-30 14:18 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-06-25 15:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-25 19:42 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-06-25 22:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 2:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 4:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 20:23 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-26 20:59 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-27 4:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-29 3:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-29 3:11 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:59 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c64d96f-f932-4db9-8119-b9e40d5b7fd9@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®