From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com,
Michael.Roth@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 21:38:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9777de5-a6fa-418c-92d2-89c095e91837@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <898e378a-cf7c-4310-b439-e28ec0a71338@amd.com>
On 6/25/2026 5:16 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Ashish,
>
> On 6/26/2026 1:12 AM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>> Hello Boris,
>>
>> On 6/25/2026 10:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 09:56:49PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>>> +/* Set while SNP has CPU hotplug disabled (kernel-lifetime; survives ccp reload). */
>>>> +static bool snp_cpu_hotplug_disabled;
>>>
>>> Do you really need this?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> cpu_hotplug_disable()/cpu_hotplug_enable() are refcounted (cpu_hotplug_disabled++/--,
>> with a WARN on underflow), so they have to be balanced. This flag collapses them to
>> exactly one outstanding disable per SNP-active window, because the disable and enable
>> sites are not reached a symmetric number of times:
>>> - On firmware without SNP_X86_SHUTDOWN_SUPPORTED, __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() does not
>> call snp_shutdown() (it's gated on data.x86_snp_shutdown), so SNP stays enabled in
>> hardware — SNP_EN stays set and hotplug stays disabled — while sev->snp_initialized is
>> cleared. Re-init after that is routine, the SNP ioctls self-bracket init and shutdown
>> (e.g. SNP_COMMIT, SNP_SET_CONFIG, SNP_VLEK_LOAD):
>>
>> if (!sev->snp_initialized)
>> snp_move_to_init_state(...); /* -> __sev_snp_init_locked -> snp_prepare() */
>> ... SNP_CMD ...
>> if (shutdown_required)
>> __sev_snp_shutdown_locked(...);
>> - So whenever SNP isn't already initialized (psp_init_on_probe off, or after a prior
>> legacy shutdown), every such ioctl does init -> command -> legacy shutdown. Each init
>> reaches snp_prepare() with SNP_EN already set, and the disable now sits at the top of
>> snp_prepare(), so it fires on every cycle. Without this flag that keeps bumping
>> cpu_hotplug_disabled while the legacy shutdown never re-enables — hotplug ends up stuck
>> disabled. This flag makes all but the first disable a no-op.
>>
>> - Also, importantly, kvm-amd module reload on legacy firmware is the same pattern:
>> unload leaves SNP_EN set, reload re-inits.)
>
> Looking at snp_prepare(), we have an early-bailout for
>
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
> if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
> return;
>
> Does executing SHUTDOWN command lead to the firmware clearing SNP_EN in
> SYSCFG on all CPUS?
Yes, in case of X86_SNP_SHUTDOWN (available if firmware supports X86SnpShutdown feature)
SNP is disabled on all cores by clearing SYSCFG[SNPEn] bit.
If X86_SNP_SHUTDOWN is set to 1, the firmware clears the SYSCFG[SNPEn] bit in each core.
But, in case of legacy SNP shutdown, SNP_EN bit is not cleared and so SNP remains enabled.
>
> If SNP_EN remains set (and Linux can't clear it since it is
> "Write-1-only" bit), then a subsequent snp_prepare() will skip setting
> SYSCFG if it sees SNP_EN on local CPU.
>
> It can so happen that we enable hotlpug at shutdown, CPUs come online
> without setting SNP_EN in SYSCFG, subsequent snp_prepare() runs on a CPU
> where SNP_EN is still set and skips configuring it for the CPUs that
> don't have it set, and we'll be in a pickle still.
>
> The comment above that bailout saying "this can happen in case of kexec
> boot" makes me believe that SNP_EN remains set until a full system
> reset.
>
> The only safe way to do this is to ensure all possible CPUs are online
> during snp_prepare() and do snp_enable() regardless of whether local CPU
> has SNP_EN or not.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
The piece that makes the early bailout safe is the disable this patch adds:
hotplug is disabled while SNP is active, so the online set can't change under an
active SNP. snp_prepare() already requires online == present, so at a successful
init every present CPU gets SNP_EN, and because hotplug is then disabled none
can leave or rejoin without it. So whenever the bailout is hit with SNP active,
every online CPU already has SNP_EN:
- kexec: SNP_EN is already set on all CPUs by the previous kernel.
- re-init while SNP is still active (e.g. after a legacy SNP_SHUTDOWN that
leaves SNP_EN set): hotplug was disabled the whole time, so the online set is
unchanged and all of them still have SNP_EN.
The only way a CPU can be online without SNP_EN is when SNP is not active --
i.e. after an SNP_INIT failure, where this patch re-enables hotplug. That is
deliberately the same as the behavior before this support existed (hotplug was
never disabled then), and it is benign: SNP_EN only gates RMP checks, the RMP
itself is initialized by SNP_INIT, so on a failed init the RMP is all-zeroes --
every entry is in the default HV-owned state, no page is assigned, no check ever blocks
and snp_initialized stays false, so no SNP guest can be created.
Nothing is enforced and nothing is protected.
So I've kept snp_prepare()'s existing bailout / snp_enable() behavior unchanged;
what this patch adds is disabling hotplug while SNP is active, which is what
actually closes the window (a CPU coming online without SNP_EN while SNP is
live). That window -- and the SNP_EN-stays-set-on-failure situation -- already
exist in today's code, this patch constrains the dangerous (active) case and
otherwise matches current behavior.
(On the v9 placement specifically: I'm moving the disable into snp_prepare()
ahead of SNP_EN in the next version; in v9 it sits after SNP_INIT, which leaves
the window you originally pointed out.)
Thanks,
Ashish
>>
>> - On the enable side it avoids an unbalanced cpu_hotplug_enable() when the teardown/failure
>> paths run without an outstanding disable (e.g. shutdown of a never-fully-initialized SNP).
>>
>> So it's not redundant with cpu_hotplug_disabled — it tracks whether the outstanding disable
>> belongs to this SNP-active window in this kernel, which keeps the single disable/enable
>> balanced across the asymmetric legacy-vs-full SNP teardown paths and re-init.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1782336473.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-06-25 3:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 5:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-30 14:18 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-06-25 15:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-25 19:42 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-25 22:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 2:38 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-06-26 4:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 20:23 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-26 20:59 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-27 4:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-29 3:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-29 3:11 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:59 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9777de5-a6fa-418c-92d2-89c095e91837@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®