From: Lucas tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@amd.com>,
Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] spi: Add flag for no TX after a RX in the same Chip Select
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:51:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7dc20785-95da-6599-49dc-8e5f805d6a14@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210908123734.GF4112@sirena.org.uk>
On 9/8/21 1:37 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 12:34:44PM +0100, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> Some controllers can't write to the bus after a read without
>> releasing the chip select, so add flag and a check in spi core
>
> Nothing you've added ever reads this flag and I'm not sure what anything
> would be able to constructively do with it so why add the flag? I don't
> understand what the use case is.
>
__spi_validate checks this flag and makes sure the message can be
received by the controller.
__spi_validate can't fix the message, so it only rejects the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 11:34 [PATCH v2 00/10] Improve support for AMD SPI controllers Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] regmap: spi: Set regmap max raw r/w from max_transfer_size Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] regmap: spi: Check raw_[read|write] against max message size Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 13:09 ` Charles Keepax
2021-09-08 13:17 ` Charles Keepax
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] spi: Add flag for no TX after a RX in the same Chip Select Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 12:37 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-09 10:51 ` Lucas tanure [this message]
2021-09-10 14:44 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get_devdata Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] spi: amd: Refactor amd_spi_busy_wait Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] spi: amd: Remove unneeded variable Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] spi: amd: Check for idle bus before execute opcode Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] spi: amd: Fill FIFO buffer with the whole message Lucas Tanure
2021-09-08 13:22 ` Charles Keepax
2021-09-08 11:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] spi: amd: Add support for latest platform Lucas Tanure
2021-09-12 21:53 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-09-08 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Improve support for AMD SPI controllers Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7dc20785-95da-6599-49dc-8e5f805d6a14@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sanju.mehta@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®