From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
"Mehta, Sanju" <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xhci-pci: Set runtime PM as default policy on all xHC 1.2 or later devices
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:34:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7df4a91d-6829-5ebf-18ca-c0783c03f443@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN0PR12MB6101ECEA1CCED9B65667031DE2239@MN0PR12MB6101.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On 11.10.2022 19.46, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 08:16
>> To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>; Limonciello,
>> Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
>> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>; Mehta, Sanju
>> <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xhci-pci: Set runtime PM as default policy on all xHC
>> 1.2 or later devices
>>
>> On 11.10.2022 8.11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> For optimal power consumption of USB4 routers the XHCI PCIe endpoint
>>>> used for tunneling must be in D3. Historically this is accomplished
>>>> by a long list of PCIe IDs that correspond to these endpoints because
>>>> the xhci_hcd driver will not default to allowing runtime PM for all
>>>> devices.
>>>>
>>>> As both AMD and Intel have released new products with new XHCI
>> controllers
>>>> this list continues to grow. In reviewing the XHCI specification v1.2 on
>>>> page 607 there is already a requirement that the PCI power management
>>>> states D3hot and D3cold must be supported.
>>>>
>>>> In the quirk list, use this to indicate that runtime PM should be allowed
>>>> on XHCI controllers. The following controllers are known to be xHC 1.2 and
>>>> dropped explicitly:
>>>> * AMD Yellow Carp
>>>> * Intel Alder Lake
>>>> * Intel Meteor Lake
>>>> * Intel Raptor Lake
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Link:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
>> w.intel.com%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2Fwww%2Fpublic%2Fus%2Fen%2Fdocum
>> ents%2Ftechnical-specifications%2Fextensible-host-controler-interface-usb-
>> xhci.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com%7Cb286e9c
>> 63e9e4c3a1a3708daab8a9b23%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0
>> %7C0%7C638010909687542135%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
>> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%
>> 7C%7C%7C&sdata=CetIs1VuAqj8nNBoLnXaGncw6Sl4JcImYY67JpVxyjg%
>> 3D&reserved=0
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Thanks, added to queue
>
> Thanks!
> For my own clarity - is this something you'll still take to 6.1, or are you meaning
> 6.2 queue at this point?
Was planning on sending it to usb-next after 6.1-rc1 is out, so ending up in 6.2
But if there's some benefit in having this already in 6.1 then I don't object that either.
>
> This thread originated from enabling Pink Sardine. Wherever it lands after it's
> baked for $long_enough I would like to bring it back to stable eventually too.
> If you think it's too risky for stable later on, can we do separate set of commits
> that adds and then removes the IDs for pink sardine that can go to stable? This
> would at least mirror more closely what has been done historically for the other
> USB4 products.
I think we can add this to stable. It's fine for Intel xHCI 1.2 hosts.
Thanks
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-10 16:00 Mario Limonciello
2022-10-11 5:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-10-11 13:16 ` Mathias Nyman
2022-10-11 16:46 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-12 8:34 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2022-10-12 12:59 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7df4a91d-6829-5ebf-18ca-c0783c03f443@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Sanju.Mehta@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome