From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: marius.cristea@microchip.com, jic23@kernel.org,
nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] add support for Microchip PAC194X Power Monitor
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 11:36:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fae9c9f-099c-4591-807c-ce43e2f3e0fa@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515092946.10791-1-marius.cristea@microchip.com>
On 5/15/26 4:29 AM, marius.cristea@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@microchip.com>
>
> Add support for Microchip PAC194X and PAC195X series of Power Monitor
> with Accumulator chip family. This driver covers the following part
> numbers:
> - PAC1941, PAC1941-2, PAC1942, PAC1942-2, PAC1943, PAC1944
> - PAC1951, PAC1951-2, PAC1952, PAC1952-2, PAC1953, PAC1954
>
> The PAC194X family supports 9V Full-Scale Range and the PAC195X supports
> 32V Full-Scale Range.
>
> There are two versions of the PAC194X/5X: the PAC194X-1/5X-1 devices are
> for high-side current sensing and the PAC194X/5X-2 devices are for low-side
> current sensing or floating VBUS applications. The PAC194X/5X-1 is named
> shortly PAC194X/5X.
>
I assume we already had the hwmon vs. iio conversation? I would expect
something in the cover letter justifying why this should be an iio device
rather than hwmon since it looks like it was designed for monitoring
e.g. CPU voltage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 9:29 marius.cristea
2026-05-15 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add support for PAC1944 marius.cristea
2026-05-15 17:29 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-15 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: adc: add support for PAC194X marius.cristea
2026-05-16 16:40 ` David Lechner
2026-05-16 18:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-16 16:36 ` David Lechner [this message]
2026-05-17 7:04 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] add support for Microchip PAC194X Power Monitor Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fae9c9f-099c-4591-807c-ce43e2f3e0fa@baylibre.com \
--to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®