mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Always guard rmaps with mmu_lock on PREEMPT_RT=y kernels
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:38:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <801fc0b175d582756d4ee6cf9adea5c1f9d61501.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902211759.2700289-1-seanjc@google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2419 bytes --]

On Wed, 2026-09-02 at 14:17 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> For all intents and purposes, revert KVM's ability to walk rmaps outside of
> mmu_lock when running on a realtime (PREEMPT_RT=y) kernel.  I.e. don't use
> a non-sleepable bit-spinlock to protect rmap entries, as realtime kernels
> are highly unlikely to benefit from increased aging throughput and reduced
> jitter for memory-overcommitted nested VMs, whereas using a non-sleepable
> lock is currently buggy and goes against the spirit of realtime kernels.
> 
> Because KVM's rmap locks are hand-crafted bit-spinlocks, preemption must be
> disabled before acquiring the lock, otherwise a preempted lock holder will
> result in all other walkers of the locked rmap to spin and wait, with no
> tracked owner for PI to boost.  For non-RT kernels, acquiring mmu_lock
> suffices, as mmu_lock is a non-sleepable rwlock.  But on RT, where mmu_lock
> becomes sleepable, preemption is left enabled for rmap writers:
> 
>   WARNING: arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:920 at __kvm_rmap_lock+0x1a7/0x1e0 [kvm], CPU#16: vmx_apic_update/3708
>   CPU: 16 UID: 0 PID: 3708 Comm: vmx_apic_update Not tainted 7.2.0-rc7 #52 PREEMPT_{RT,LAZY}
>   RIP: 0010:__kvm_rmap_lock+0x1a7/0x1e0 [kvm]
>   Call Trace:
>    pte_list_add+0x67/0x4d0 [kvm]
>    __link_shadow_page+0x249/0x480 [kvm]
>    ept_fetch+0x4d5/0x1220 [kvm]
>    ept_page_fault+0x60b/0x850 [kvm]
>    kvm_mmu_do_page_fault+0x252/0x690 [kvm]
> 
> Alternatively, KVM could manually disable preemption when grabbing an rmap
> lock, but as above, that isn't what RT kernels generally want, and it's
> actually more complex to implement (cleanly).
> 
> To not completely lose the scaling advantage of per-rmap locks, take
> mmu_lock for read in the aging path, i.e. allow multiple concurrent aging
> tasks, as the aging code needs to use atomic SPTE accesses no matter what,
> i.e. no extra code/work is required to guard against concurrent aging of
> SPTEs.
> 
> Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8d47b43e1829ac92703723e6a1a4afc7a2eaacb5.camel@infradead.org
> Fixes: 4834eaded91e ("KVM: x86/mmu: Add infrastructure to allow walking rmaps outside of mmu_lock")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>


[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 6179 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 21:17 Sean Christopherson
2026-09-02 21:42 ` James Houghton
2026-09-02 22:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-02 22:38 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2026-09-21 14:05 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=801fc0b175d582756d4ee6cf9adea5c1f9d61501.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®