Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Thermal cpufreq & devfreq cooling minor clean-ups

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 14/06/2022 14:51, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> 
> On 6/13/22 13:43, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is v2 of some minor clean-ups for the thermal cpufreq and devfreq
>> cooling code.
>>
>> Changes:
>> v2:
>> - extened the cpufreq_cooling_device with private ops field, to not waste
>>    memory and simplify allocation/free code (Viresh)
>> - added devfreq_cooling clean-up to align with cpufreq cooling code
>> - added ACKs from Viresh for patch 2/4 and path 3/4
>> - added missing maintainers of tracing to CC list
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lukasz
>>
>> Lukasz Luba (4):
>>    thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Use private callback ops for each cooling
>>      device
>>    thermal: cpufreq_cooling : Refactor thermal_power_cpu_get_power
>>      tracing
>>    thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Update outdated comments
>>    thermal: devfreq_cooling: Extend the devfreq_cooling_device with ops
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 77 ++++++++++---------------------
>>   drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c | 27 ++++-------
>>   include/trace/events/thermal.h    | 28 ++++-------
>>   3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Could you have a look and take the patches into your tree, please?
> The 3 of 4 patches got ACKs, the last one is devfreq cooling, which
> is pretty minor change.

Applied, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog