* [PATCH 1/2] scsi: fnic: Replace fnic->lock_flags with local flags
@ 2025-02-25 21:51 Karan Tilak Kumar
2025-02-25 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking Karan Tilak Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Karan Tilak Kumar @ 2025-02-25 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sebaddel
Cc: arulponn, djhawar, gcboffa, mkai2, satishkh, aeasi, jejb,
martin.petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Karan Tilak Kumar,
Dan Carpenter
Replace fnic->lock_flags with local variable for usage with spinlocks
in fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work.
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: a63e78eb2b0f ("scsi: fnic: Add support for fabric based solicited requests and responses")
Reviewed-by: Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Gian Carlo Boffa <gcboffa@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun Easi <aeasi@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
index 3a41e92d5fd6..8843d9486dbb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
@@ -308,23 +308,24 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct fnic *fnic = iport->fnic;
struct reclaim_entry_s *reclaim_entry;
unsigned long delay_j = msecs_to_jiffies(OXID_RECLAIM_TOV(iport));
+ unsigned long flags;
int idx;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, fnic->lock_flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
for_each_set_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free, FNIC_OXID_POOL_SZ) {
FNIC_FCS_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->host, fnic->fnic_num,
"Schedule oxid free. oxid idx: %d\n", idx);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, fnic->lock_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
reclaim_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*reclaim_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, fnic->lock_flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
if (!reclaim_entry) {
schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->schedule_oxid_free_retry,
msecs_to_jiffies(SCHEDULE_OXID_FREE_RETRY_TIME));
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, fnic->lock_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
return;
}
@@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, fnic->lock_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
}
static bool fdls_is_oxid_fabric_req(uint16_t oxid)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking
2025-02-25 21:51 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: fnic: Replace fnic->lock_flags with local flags Karan Tilak Kumar
@ 2025-02-25 21:51 ` Karan Tilak Kumar
2025-02-26 7:32 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Karan Tilak Kumar @ 2025-02-25 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sebaddel
Cc: arulponn, djhawar, gcboffa, mkai2, satishkh, aeasi, jejb,
martin.petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Karan Tilak Kumar,
Dan Carpenter
Remove unnecessary locking and unlocking of spinlock in
fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work.
This will shorten the time in the critical section.
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: a63e78eb2b0f ("scsi: fnic: Add support for fabric based solicited requests and responses")
Reviewed-by: Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Gian Carlo Boffa <gcboffa@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun Easi <aeasi@cisco.com>
Tested-by: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
index 8843d9486dbb..6530298733f0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
@@ -311,36 +311,30 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
unsigned long flags;
int idx;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
-
for_each_set_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free, FNIC_OXID_POOL_SZ) {
FNIC_FCS_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->host, fnic->fnic_num,
"Schedule oxid free. oxid idx: %d\n", idx);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
reclaim_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*reclaim_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
-
if (!reclaim_entry) {
schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->schedule_oxid_free_retry,
msecs_to_jiffies(SCHEDULE_OXID_FREE_RETRY_TIME));
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
return;
}
if (test_and_clear_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free)) {
reclaim_entry->oxid_idx = idx;
reclaim_entry->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + delay_j);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&reclaim_entry->links, &oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_work, delay_j);
} else {
/* unlikely scenario, free the allocated memory and continue */
kfree(reclaim_entry);
}
}
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
}
static bool fdls_is_oxid_fabric_req(uint16_t oxid)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking
2025-02-25 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking Karan Tilak Kumar
@ 2025-02-26 7:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-27 1:16 ` Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-02-26 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karan Tilak Kumar
Cc: sebaddel, arulponn, djhawar, gcboffa, mkai2, satishkh, aeasi,
jejb, martin.petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:51:46PM -0800, Karan Tilak Kumar wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> index 8843d9486dbb..6530298733f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> @@ -311,36 +311,30 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
> unsigned long flags;
> int idx;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> -
> for_each_set_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free, FNIC_OXID_POOL_SZ) {
>
> FNIC_FCS_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->host, fnic->fnic_num,
> "Schedule oxid free. oxid idx: %d\n", idx);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> reclaim_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*reclaim_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> -
> if (!reclaim_entry) {
> schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->schedule_oxid_free_retry,
> msecs_to_jiffies(SCHEDULE_OXID_FREE_RETRY_TIME));
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> return;
> }
>
> if (test_and_clear_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free)) {
We discussed this earlier and I really should have brought it up then,
but what is this check about? We "know" (scare quotes) that it is true
because we're inside a for_each_set_bit() loop. I had assumed it was to
test for race conditions so that's why I put it under the lock. If the
locking doesn't matter then we could just do a clear_bit() without doing
a second test.
regards,
dan carpenter
> reclaim_entry->oxid_idx = idx;
> reclaim_entry->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + delay_j);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> list_add_tail(&reclaim_entry->links, &oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_work, delay_j);
> } else {
> /* unlikely scenario, free the allocated memory and continue */
> kfree(reclaim_entry);
> }
> }
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static bool fdls_is_oxid_fabric_req(uint16_t oxid)
> --
> 2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking
2025-02-26 7:32 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-02-27 1:16 ` Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak) @ 2025-02-27 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Sesidhar Baddela (sebaddel), Arulprabhu Ponnusamy (arulponn),
Dhanraj Jhawar (djhawar), Gian Carlo Boffa (gcboffa),
Masa Kai (mkai2), Satish Kharat (satishkh), Arun Easi (aeasi),
jejb, martin.petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:32 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:51:46PM -0800, Karan Tilak Kumar wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > index 8843d9486dbb..6530298733f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > @@ -311,36 +311,30 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int idx;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > -
> > for_each_set_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free, FNIC_OXID_POOL_SZ) {
> >
> > FNIC_FCS_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->host, fnic->fnic_num,
> > "Schedule oxid free. oxid idx: %d\n", idx);
> >
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > reclaim_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*reclaim_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > -
> > if (!reclaim_entry) {
> > schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->schedule_oxid_free_retry,
> > msecs_to_jiffies(SCHEDULE_OXID_FREE_RETRY_TIME));
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free)) {
>
> We discussed this earlier and I really should have brought it up then,
> but what is this check about? We "know" (scare quotes) that it is true
> because we're inside a for_each_set_bit() loop. I had assumed it was to
> test for race conditions so that's why I put it under the lock. If the
> locking doesn't matter then we could just do a clear_bit() without doing
> a second test.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > reclaim_entry->oxid_idx = idx;
> > reclaim_entry->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + delay_j);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > list_add_tail(&reclaim_entry->links, &oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_list);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_work, delay_j);
> > } else {
> > /* unlikely scenario, free the allocated memory and continue */
> > kfree(reclaim_entry);
> > }
> > }
>
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > static bool fdls_is_oxid_fabric_req(uint16_t oxid)
> > --
> > 2.47.1
>
Thanks for your review and comments, Dan.
You are right; We reviewed it, and locking is only needed to add to the reclaim list.
We can use clear_bit. I'll send out a revised patch for this.
Regards,
Karan (on behalf of the Cisco team)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-27 1:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-25 21:51 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: fnic: Replace fnic->lock_flags with local flags Karan Tilak Kumar
2025-02-25 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: fnic: Remove unnecessary spinlock locking and unlocking Karan Tilak Kumar
2025-02-26 7:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-27 1:16 ` Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®