mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mike.leach@linaro.org,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/26] coresight: etm4x: Clean up exception level masks
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:15:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80b0933d-ef0a-2937-bf47-daf9fefebf3f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106185241.GA3299843@xps15>

On 11/6/20 6:52 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Good morning,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:09:37PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> etm4_get_access_type() calculates the exception level bits
>> for use in address comparator registers. This is also used
>> by the TRCVICTLR register by shifting to the required position.
>>
>> This patch cleans up the logic to make etm4_get_access_type()
>> calcualte a generic mask which can be used by all users by
>> shifting to their field.
>>
>> No functional changes, only code cleanups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since previous version:
>>    - Fix the duplicate shift. More commentary
>> ---


>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
>> index 2ac4ecb0af61..f1251ddf1984 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
>> @@ -548,24 +548,38 @@
>>   
>>   #define TRCACATR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT		8
>>   
>> -/* secure state access levels - TRCACATRn */
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_APP		BIT(8)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_OS		BIT(9)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_HYP		BIT(10)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_MON		BIT(11)
>> -/* non-secure state access levels - TRCACATRn */
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_APP		BIT(12)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_OS		BIT(13)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_HYP		BIT(14)
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_NA		BIT(15)
>> -
>> -/* access level control in TRCVICTLR - same bits as TRCACATRn but shifted */
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_LSHIFT_TRCVICTLR	8
>> +/*
>> + * Exception level mask for Secure and Non-Secure ELs.
>> + * ETM defines the bits for EL control (e.g, TRVICTLR, TRCACTRn).
>> + * The Secure and Non-Secure ELs are always to gether.
>> + * Non-secure EL3 is never implemented.
>> + * We use the following generic mask as they appear in different
>> + * registers and this can be shifted for the appropriate
>> + * fields.
>> + */
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_APP		BIT(0)	/* Secure EL0		*/
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_OS		BIT(1)	/* Secure EL1		*/
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_HYP		BIT(2)	/* Secure EL2		*/
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_MON		BIT(3)	/* Secure EL3/Montor	*/
> 
> s/Montor/Monitor
> 
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_APP		BIT(4)	/* NonSecure EL0	*/
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_OS		BIT(5)	/* NonSecure EL1	*/
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_HYP		BIT(6)	/* NonSecure EL2	*/
>> +
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_MASK		(GENMASK(6, 0))
> 
> Not used.
> 

I have updated the patch to use this for creating the TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_MASK
(see below), which is used to clear all the EXLEVEL bits from TRCVICTLR.

>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_MASK		(GENMASK(3, 0))
>> +#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK		(GENMASK(6, 4))
> 
> This needs to be GENMASK(2, 0) in order TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_SHIFT to be 20.
> Otherwise the resulting mask is 4 bit off to the left.

I have retained the ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK as it is above, to keep the defintions
above consistent. I have fixed the problem by using TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT whenever
we use ETM_EXLEVEL_*_MASK.

And TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_*_SHIFT is used when we set a given value from the sysfs, respectively.
e.g :

@@ -795,10 +795,10 @@ static ssize_t ns_exlevel_vinst_store(struct device *dev,

         spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
         /* clear EXLEVEL_NS bits  */
-       config->vinst_ctrl &= ~(ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_VICTLR_MASK);
+       config->vinst_ctrl &= ~(TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK);
         /* enable instruction tracing for corresponding exception level */
         val &= drvdata->ns_ex_level;
-       config->vinst_ctrl |= (val << 20);
+       config->vinst_ctrl |= (val << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_SHIFT);
         spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
         return size;
  }

> 
>> +
>> +/* access level controls in TRCACATRn */
>> +#define TRCACATR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT		8
>> +
>> +/* access level control in TRCVICTLR */
>> +#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT		16
>> +#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_S_SHIFT	16
>> +#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_SHIFT	20
>>   
>>   /* secure / non secure masks - TRCVICTLR, IDR3 */
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_S_VICTLR_MASK	GENMASK(19, 16)
>> -/* NS MON (EL3) mode never implemented */
>> -#define ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_VICTLR_MASK	GENMASK(22, 20)
>> +#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_S_MASK	(ETM_EXLEVEL_S_MASK << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_S_SHIFT)
>> +#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK	(ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_SHIFT)

And the above has been updated to :

+#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_MASK         (ETM_EXLEVEL_MASK << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT)
+#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_S_MASK       (ETM_EXLEVEL_S_MASK << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT)
+#define TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK      (ETM_EXLEVEL_NS_MASK << TRCVICTLR_EXLEVEL_SHIFT)

Suzuki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28 22:09 [PATCH v3 00/26] coresight: Support for ETM system instructions Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 01/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCVMIDCTLR1 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCCIDCTLR1 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/26] coresight: etm4x: Update TRCIDR3.NUMPROCS handling to match v4.2 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCPROCSELR Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle TRCVIPCSSCTLR accesses Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle access to TRCSSPCICRn Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-02 21:46   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-02 22:04     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/26] coresight: Introduce device access abstraction Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 17:14   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-03 17:25     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:07       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 21:00   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10  9:24     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 17:02       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/26] coresight: tpiu: Prepare for using coresight " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/26] coresight: Convert coresight_timeout to use " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:42     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/26] coresight: Convert claim/disclaim operations to use access wrappers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:36   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:54     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/26] coresight: etm4x: Always read the registers on the host CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 12/26] coresight: etm4x: Convert all register accesses Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:53   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 13/26] coresight: etm4x: Add commentary on the registers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 19:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-03 19:04   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 14/26] coresight: etm4x: Add sysreg access helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-29 15:26   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 20:52   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-05 22:47     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 15/26] coresight: etm4x: Define DEVARCH register fields Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 16/26] coresight: etm4x: Check for Software Lock Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 21:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 17/26] coresight: etm4x: Cleanup secure exception level masks Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 21:55   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09  9:40     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 17:42       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 18/26] coresight: etm4x: Clean up " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 18:52   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09  9:44     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 23:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 19/26] coresight: etm4x: Detect access early on the target CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 20:34   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09  9:48     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 17:48       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-06 20:46   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:47     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 20/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle ETM architecture version Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 21:11   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09  9:51     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 21/26] coresight: etm4x: Use TRCDEVARCH for component discovery Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 21:42   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 22/26] coresight: etm4x: Add necessary synchronization for sysreg access Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 18:32   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:11     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 11:40       ` John Horley
2020-11-10 17:35       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 23/26] coresight: etm4x: Detect system instructions support Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10  9:31     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 17:33       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 24/26] coresight: etm4x: Refactor probing routine Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 25/26] coresight: etm4x: Add support for sysreg only devices Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:46   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 26/26] dts: bindings: coresight: ETM system register access only units Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-02 15:31   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-09 20:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:51     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-29  7:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/26] coresight: Support for ETM system instructions Mike Leach
2020-10-29 15:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80b0933d-ef0a-2937-bf47-daf9fefebf3f@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome