From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mike.leach@linaro.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/26] coresight: Convert claim/disclaim operations to use access wrappers
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:54:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d6bedd7-37b3-ff2d-51b1-7fd4d2f7024a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103183625.GD2855763@xps15>
On 11/3/20 6:36 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:09:29PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Convert the generic CLAIM tag management APIs to use the
>> device access layer abstraction.
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 66 +++++++++++--------
>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 17 +++--
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c | 4 +-
>> .../coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c | 8 ++-
>> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 4 +-
>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-funnel.c | 6 +-
>> .../coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 16 +++--
>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 10 +--
>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 4 +-
>> include/linux/coresight.h | 16 ++---
>> 11 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void coresight_set_claim_tags(void __iomem *base)
>> +static inline void coresight_set_claim_tags(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> {
>> - writel_relaxed(CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED, base + CORESIGHT_CLAIMSET);
>> + csdev_access_relaxed_write32(&csdev->access, CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
>> + CORESIGHT_CLAIMSET);
>
> Indentation
>
>> isb();
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void coresight_clear_claim_tags(void __iomem *base)
>> +static inline void coresight_clear_claim_tags(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> {
>> - writel_relaxed(CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED, base + CORESIGHT_CLAIMCLR);
>> + csdev_access_relaxed_write32(&csdev->access, CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
>> + CORESIGHT_CLAIMCLR);
>
> Indentation
>
>> isb();
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> index fcf25740116c..e35d79e74e30 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> @@ -45,12 +45,18 @@ struct replicator_drvdata {
>>
>> static void dynamic_replicator_reset(struct replicator_drvdata *drvdata)
>> {
>> + struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
>> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>>
>> - if (!coresight_claim_device_unlocked(drvdata->base)) {
>> + if (WARN_ON(!csdev))
>> + return;
>
> I don't see a need for this check. Function replicator_reset() is called from
> probe() where the validity of drvdata->csdev is checked just before.
>
Correct. We only needed drvdata->base earlier, which was fine. But we
now need csdev for the reset. That check was added to make sure that
we don't break the guarantee. I could take that down.
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 22:09 [PATCH v3 00/26] coresight: Support for ETM system instructions Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 01/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCVMIDCTLR1 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCCIDCTLR1 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/26] coresight: etm4x: Update TRCIDR3.NUMPROCS handling to match v4.2 Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/26] coresight: etm4x: Fix accesses to TRCPROCSELR Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle TRCVIPCSSCTLR accesses Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle access to TRCSSPCICRn Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-02 21:46 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-02 22:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/26] coresight: Introduce device access abstraction Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 17:14 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-03 17:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 21:00 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 9:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 17:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/26] coresight: tpiu: Prepare for using coresight " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/26] coresight: Convert coresight_timeout to use " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/26] coresight: Convert claim/disclaim operations to use access wrappers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 10:54 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/26] coresight: etm4x: Always read the registers on the host CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 12/26] coresight: etm4x: Convert all register accesses Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 18:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 13/26] coresight: etm4x: Add commentary on the registers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-03 19:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-03 19:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 14/26] coresight: etm4x: Add sysreg access helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-29 15:26 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 20:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-05 22:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 15/26] coresight: etm4x: Define DEVARCH register fields Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 16/26] coresight: etm4x: Check for Software Lock Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 21:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 17/26] coresight: etm4x: Cleanup secure exception level masks Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-05 21:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09 9:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 18/26] coresight: etm4x: Clean up " Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 18:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09 9:44 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 23:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 19/26] coresight: etm4x: Detect access early on the target CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 20:34 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09 9:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 17:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-06 20:46 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 20/26] coresight: etm4x: Handle ETM architecture version Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 21:11 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-09 9:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 21/26] coresight: etm4x: Use TRCDEVARCH for component discovery Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-06 21:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 22/26] coresight: etm4x: Add necessary synchronization for sysreg access Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 18:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 11:40 ` John Horley
2020-11-10 17:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 23/26] coresight: etm4x: Detect system instructions support Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:22 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 9:31 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-10 17:33 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 24/26] coresight: etm4x: Refactor probing routine Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 25/26] coresight: etm4x: Add support for sysreg only devices Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-09 20:46 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:50 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 26/26] dts: bindings: coresight: ETM system register access only units Suzuki K Poulose
2020-11-02 15:31 ` Rob Herring
2020-11-09 20:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-10 10:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-10-29 7:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/26] coresight: Support for ETM system instructions Mike Leach
2020-10-29 15:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d6bedd7-37b3-ff2d-51b1-7fd4d2f7024a@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®