From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/microcode: Add microcode loader debugging functionality
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:04:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82cdc358-3551-4c8b-a387-0e9da4668b44@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250809094206.28028-3-bp@kernel.org>
On 8/9/2025 2:42 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 7c095177da85..fc002b1a9f57 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3770,6 +3770,13 @@
> microcode= [X86] Control the behavior of the microcode loader.
> Available options, comma separated:
>
> + dbg - Format: <bool>
Since this is all new code, would it be better to use the expanded form
of dbg everywhere?
s/dbg/debug/
s/MICROCODE_DBG/MICROCODE_DEBUG
s/ucode_dbg/ucode_debug
Also, I didn't understand the "Format: <bool>".
Isn't the usage similar to force_minrev? So microcode=debug should be
enough, right?
> + enable debugging mode when run in a guest
> +
> + base_rev=X - with <X> with format: <u32>
> + Set the base microcode revision of each thread when in
> + debug mode.
> +
> force_minrev
> Enable or disable the microcode minimal revision
> enforcement for the runtime microcode loader.
Slight preference for a tabbed description:
debug
enable debugging mode when run in a guest
base_rev=X - with <X> with format: <u32>
Set the base microcode revision of each thread when in
debug mode.
force_minrev
Enable or disable the microcode minimal revision
enforcement for the runtime microcode loader.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 58d890fe2100..462bf03aeda5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1360,6 +1360,18 @@ config MICROCODE_LATE_FORCE_MINREV
>
> If unsure say Y.
>
> +config MICROCODE_DBG
> + bool "Enable microcode loader debugging"
> + default n
Isn't default n redundant? I am fine with keeping it to make it obvious.
> + depends on MICROCODE
Should we also include a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL?
> + help
> + Enable code which allows for debugging the microcode loader in
> + a guest. Meaning the patch loading is simulated but everything else
> + related to patch parsing and handling is done as on baremetal with
> + the purpose of debugging solely the software side of things.
> +
> + You almost certainly want to say n here.
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-09 9:42 [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode: Add debugging glue Borislav Petkov
2025-08-09 9:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/microcode: Add microcode= cmdline parsing Borislav Petkov
2025-08-12 2:26 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-12 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-12 19:14 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-12 21:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-14 23:08 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-15 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-15 19:50 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-18 16:30 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-09 9:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/microcode: Add microcode loader debugging functionality Borislav Petkov
2025-08-12 3:04 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-08-12 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-12 18:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-12 19:09 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82cdc358-3551-4c8b-a387-0e9da4668b44@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®