From: Caveh Jalali <ecaveh@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Makefile: can't build modules outside the kernel tree if it was built using O=
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:49:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <830a8fa70909171449s597931a2t51f37be6378ddef7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909171345.30988.arnd@arndb.de>
sadly, some 3rd party src packages don't quite do the right thing with
their kernel include paths and still depend on the include2/asm symlink
to find the platform header files.
i see your point about include2 being somewhat redundant/legacy, however,
as long as we are creating it, we should have it point to the intended
location instead of being a dead link!
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 September 2009, Caveh Jalali wrote:
>
>> when the platform specific include directories were shuffled around
>> without updating the
>> top level Makefile. however, i think this FAIL is generic, and not
>> limited to powerpc.
>> here's a patch to the top level Makefile to teach it about the shuffled files:
>>
>>
>> --- /local/caveh/linux/linux-2.6.31/Makefile 2009-09-09
>> 15:13:59.000000000 -0700
>> +++ Makefile 2009-09-16 12:23:05.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -958,9 +958,9 @@ ifneq ($(KBUILD_SRC),)
>> echo " in the '$(srctree)' directory.";\
>> /bin/false; \
>> fi;
>> - $(Q)if [ ! -d include2 ]; then \
>> - mkdir -p include2; \
>> - ln -fsn $(srctree)/include/asm-$(SRCARCH) include2/asm; \
>> + $(Q)if [ ! -d include2 ]; then \
>> + mkdir -p include2; \
>> + ln -fsn $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/asm include2/asm; \
>> fi
>> endif
>
> I think we should no longer have the include2 directory at all with new kernels.
>
> LINUXINCLUDE already contains the right path in theory:
>
> LINUXINCLUDE := -Iinclude \
> $(if $(KBUILD_SRC),-Iinclude2 -I$(srctree)/include) \
> -I$(srctree)/arch/$(hdr-arch)/include \
> -include include/linux/autoconf.h
>
> I'm not sure what goes wrong here. What is the gcc command line you see?
>
> Arnd <><
>
--
00c
http://www.boincstats.com/signature/user_870433_project5.gif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 2:30 Caveh Jalali
2009-09-17 3:15 ` Américo Wang
2009-09-17 4:40 ` Caveh Jalali
2009-09-17 11:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-17 21:49 ` Caveh Jalali [this message]
2009-09-18 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-18 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-18 1:49 ` Américo Wang
2009-09-18 4:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-21 14:37 ` [PATCH] warn about use of uninstalled kernel headers Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-22 4:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-22 13:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-27 8:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-19 9:06 ` [patch] Makefile: can't build modules outside the kernel tree if it was built using O= Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=830a8fa70909171449s597931a2t51f37be6378ddef7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ecaveh@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®