mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'peterz@infradead.org'" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "'mingo@redhat.com'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'will@kernel.org'" <will@kernel.org>,
	"'boqun.feng@gmail.com'" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org'"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	'Zeng Heng' <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 5/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise decode_cpu() and per_cpu_ptr().
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 18:13:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8373c730-2e08-4abb-8d21-fd9a76116d2c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2c35933c3de481faec0b201ab1a0c16@AcuMS.aculab.com>


On 5/3/24 17:10, David Laight wrote:
> From: Waiman Long
>> Sent: 03 May 2024 17:00
> ...
>> David,
>>
>> Could you respin the series based on the latest upstream code?
> I've just reapplied the patches to 'master' and they all apply
> cleanly and diffing the new patches to the old ones gives no differences.
> So I think they should still apply.
>
> Were you seeing a specific problem?
>
> I don't remember any suggested changed either.
> (Apart from a very local variable I used to keep a patch isolated.)

No, I just want to make sure that your patches will still apply. Anyway, 
it will be easier for the maintainer to merge your remaining patches if 
you can send out a new version even if they are almost the same as the 
old ones.

Thanks,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-31 21:49 [PATCH next v2 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code David Laight
2023-12-31 21:51 ` [PATCH next v2 1/5] locking/osq_lock: Defer clearing node->locked until the slow osq_lock() path David Laight
2024-01-01  4:08   ` Waiman Long
2024-01-02  9:49   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-01-02  9:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-12-31 21:52 ` [PATCH next v2 2/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise the vcpu_is_preempted() check David Laight
2024-01-01  4:09   ` Waiman Long
2024-01-02  9:49   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-01-08  7:42   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-31 21:54 ` [PATCH next v2 3/5] locking/osq_lock: Use node->prev_cpu instead of saving node->prev David Laight
2024-01-01  4:09   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-31 21:54 ` [PATCH next v2 4/5] locking/osq_lock: Avoid writing to node->next in the osq_lock() fast path David Laight
2024-01-01  4:13   ` Waiman Long
2024-01-02  9:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-12-31 21:55 ` [PATCH next v2 5/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise decode_cpu() and per_cpu_ptr() David Laight
2024-01-01  4:14   ` Waiman Long
2024-01-01  8:47     ` David Laight
2024-05-03 15:59     ` Waiman Long
2024-05-03 16:16       ` David Laight
2024-05-03 21:10       ` David Laight
2024-05-03 22:13         ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-05-04 20:26           ` David Laight
2024-01-02  9:54   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-01-02 10:20     ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8373c730-2e08-4abb-8d21-fd9a76116d2c@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®