From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] Add the memory allocation/freeing hooks for kmemleak
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:17:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020607102317r60d797eakdf20107e158ec251@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060710220957.5191.54019.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Catalin
On 7/11/06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 85c2e03..2752272 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -2967,6 +2967,7 @@ #endif
> STATS_INC_ALLOCMISS(cachep);
> objp = cache_alloc_refill(cachep, flags);
> }
> + memleak_erase(&ac->entry[ac->avail]);
> return objp;
> }
Can't we tell the GC not to scan any of the array cache structs? You
could put that in alloc_arraycache(), I think.
> @@ -3209,7 +3211,11 @@ static void __cache_free(struct kmem_cac
> */
> void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
> {
> - return __cache_alloc(cachep, flags, __builtin_return_address(0));
> + void *ptr = __cache_alloc(cachep, flags, __builtin_return_address(0));
> +
> + memleak_alloc(ptr, obj_size(cachep), 1);
Can you move memleak_alloc() call to __cache_alloc() instead to avoid
duplication?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 22:09 [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8 Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] Base support for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] Some documentation " Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 03/10] Add the memory allocation/freeing hooks " Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 6:17 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2006-07-11 7:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] Modules support " Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] Add kmemleak support for i386 Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] Add kmemleak support for ARM Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 6:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-11 8:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] Keep the __init functions after initialization Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] Simple testing for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-07-10 22:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] Update the MAINTAINERS file " Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8 Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 12:46 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 12:51 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 13:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 13:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-12 9:57 ` Joseph Fannin
2006-07-12 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 10:49 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-14 2:22 ` Horst von Brand
2006-07-11 12:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 13:17 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 13:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 13:49 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 15:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 16:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 16:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-11 17:00 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-11 21:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-12 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 22:55 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-13 16:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-13 19:14 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-14 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 13:19 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-12 14:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 15:33 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-12 16:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-12 18:46 ` Xiaolan Zhang
2006-07-13 18:52 ` Xiaolan Zhang
2006-07-13 19:17 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020607102317r60d797eakdf20107e158ec251@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®