From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>, "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:27:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020607112327y48d9cccueb4c5e3904d6981@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060710233944.GB30332@thunk.org>
Hi,
On 7/11/06, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> When I wrote the do_SAK code about 12-13 years ago, tty->tty_files
> didn't exist. It should be safe to do this, but I'll echo Alan's
> comment. We really ought to implement revoke(2) at the VFS layer, and
> then utilize to implement SAK and vhangup() functionality.
How is this supposed to work? What's stopping a process from
re-opening the file after revoke(2) has been called? Or am I missing
something here?
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-12 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 15:10 Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 17:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 17:27 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 18:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 18:09 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 23:18 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 22:35 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 23:15 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 23:04 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 23:49 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 1:29 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-11 2:16 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 10:12 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-11 12:28 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 13:15 ` Paulo Marques
2006-07-11 13:42 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 3:33 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 19:52 ` Russell King
2006-07-11 19:44 ` Russell King
2006-07-11 22:08 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 22:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-11 23:28 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-07-12 0:00 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-11 23:50 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-12 3:55 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-12 11:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 23:39 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-11 0:25 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-12 6:27 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2006-07-12 11:19 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020607112327y48d9cccueb4c5e3904d6981@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®