From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020903250034j24e1782bt5f73809b9349346c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090325052023.071564146@goodmis.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Impact: clean up
>
> A NULL pointer to kfree is no longer unlikely, as seen by the
> annotated branch profiler:
>
> correct incorrect % Function File Line
> ------- --------- - -------- ---- ----
> 728571 1315540 64 kfree slab.c 3719
>
> This makes sense, since we now encourage developers to just call kfree
> without checking for NULL.
But those are _error handling paths_ (at least supposed to be). I
wonder which call-sites are responsible for this. Can frtrace help us
here?
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 2 +-
> mm/slob.c | 2 +-
> mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 4d00855..0386c33 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3716,7 +3716,7 @@ void kfree(const void *objp)
> struct kmem_cache *c;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp)))
> + if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp))
> return;
> local_irq_save(flags);
> kfree_debugcheck(objp);
> diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> index 52bc8a2..e077174 100644
> --- a/mm/slob.c
> +++ b/mm/slob.c
> @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ void kfree(const void *block)
> {
> struct slob_page *sp;
>
> - if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(block)))
> + if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(block))
> return;
>
> sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 0280eee..65dc436 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2743,7 +2743,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)
> struct page *page;
> void *object = (void *)x;
>
> - if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(x)))
> + if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(x))
> return;
>
> page = virt_to_head_page(x);
> --
> 1.6.2
>
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 5:19 [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: remove incorrect unlikelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-03-25 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 9:28 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:34 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-03-25 7:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-25 8:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 8:02 ` Hua Zhong
2009-03-25 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 13:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 14:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 14:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 16:14 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 21:09 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 16:10 ` Al Viro
2009-03-26 16:15 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: remove unlikely in pre_schedule_rt Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: remove unlikelys from sched_move_task Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove unlikelys for unlock in rmap.c Steven Rostedt
2009-04-24 11:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-24 12:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-25 7:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 16:30 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020903250034j24e1782bt5f73809b9349346c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®