Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or
>>> two.
>>
>> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi
>> problem that Guenter has been reporting?
>>
>> That problem has been pending for quite a while now.
> 
> OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed.
> 
> Hans did you see Guenthers remark here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/
> 
> Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now?
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next.

 From my notes:

Fix posted at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/
and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi:
sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset").
The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/
This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl:
sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs").

Guenter