From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/fred: enable FRED by default
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:01:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84489fd4-aa23-4ba1-b5a1-c1baafb6718d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323201510.1537333-1-hpa@zytor.com>
On 3/23/2026 1:15 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Can we please include this as well?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fred.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fred.c
index e736b19e18de..117aa06d25ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fred.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fred.c
@@ -27,9 +27,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(fred_rsp0);
void cpu_init_fred_exceptions(void)
{
- /* When FRED is enabled by default, remove this log message */
- pr_info("Initialize FRED on CPU%d\n", smp_processor_id());
-
/*
* If a kernel event is delivered before a CPU goes to user level for
* the first time, its SS is NULL thus NULL is pushed into the SS field
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 03a550630644..bfa8a20ccc37 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1750,8 +1750,8 @@ Kernel parameters
> fred= [X86-64]
> Enable/disable Flexible Return and Event Delivery.
> Format: { on | off }
> - on: enable FRED when it's present.
> - off: disable FRED, the default setting.
> + on: enable FRED when it's present, the default setting.
Why do we need the fred=on line after this series? It can't really
enable FRED when the compile option is disabled. Seems like a dead (and
slightly confusing) option to me.
> + off: disable FRED.
>
> ftrace=[tracer]
> [FTRACE] will set and start the specified tracer
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index e2df1b147184..876b663dcf38 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ config X86_FRED
> bool "Flexible Return and Event Delivery"
> depends on X86_64
> help
> - When enabled, try to use Flexible Return and Event Delivery
> + When enabled, use Flexible Return and Event Delivery
> instead of the legacy SYSCALL/SYSENTER/IDT architecture for
> ring transitions and exception/interrupt handling if the
> system supports it.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index a8ff4376c286..e22a49869380 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ static void __init cpu_parse_early_param(void)
>
> /* Minimize the gap between FRED is available and available but disabled. */
> arglen = cmdline_find_option(boot_command_line, "fred", arg, sizeof(arg));
> - if (arglen != 2 || strncmp(arg, "on", 2))
> + if (arglen > 0 && (arglen != 2 || strncmp(arg, "on", 2)))
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_FRED);
Nit: Would it be better to compare with "off" rather than not on?
>
> arglen = cmdline_find_option(boot_command_line, "clearcpuid", arg, sizeof(arg));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 20:15 H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] " H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/Kconfig: tighten up wording of the CONFIG_X86_FRED help text H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 20:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/fred: enable FRED by default Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-24 1:01 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2026-03-24 3:05 ` Xin Li
2026-03-24 3:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 5:08 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-24 6:34 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-24 7:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 17:19 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-24 19:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-25 16:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-25 16:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-25 16:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-25 17:07 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-24 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84489fd4-aa23-4ba1-b5a1-c1baafb6718d@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome