Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-uart-backlight: recover from stray EC response byte

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Sun, 4 Oct 2026, chitranshmandhaniya@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Chitransh Mandhaniya <Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com>
> 
> On some Dell AIO machines the EC occasionally inserts a spurious byte
> after the cmd-echo in UART backlight response frames. A get-brightness
> reply "04 0c 0a e5" arrives as "04 0c 0d 0a e5". The length field still
> reflects the original frame size, so the parser consumes the stray byte
> as payload and mistakes the real payload for the checksum, returning
> -EIO.
> 
> Handle this in dell_uart_bl_receive(): on the first checksum failure for
> a frame longer than the minimum size, drop the byte at the first payload
> offset, shift the rest down by one, read one more byte as the new
> checksum, and re-validate.  Limit this single-byte resync to once per
> command via a resync_used flag cleared at the start of each transaction.
> A second mismatch is still a hard error.
> 
> Well-formed replies pass on the first check and never enter the recovery
> path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chitransh Mandhaniya <Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c   | 92 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> index f323a667dc2d..068b91c21bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>  #define MAX_RESP_LEN			80
>  
>  struct dell_uart_backlight {
> -	struct mutex mutex;
> +	struct mutex mutex; /* Protects command + response state below */
>  	wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct backlight_device *bl;
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct dell_uart_backlight {
>  	u8 resp_len;
>  	u8 resp_max_len;
>  	u8 pending_cmd;
> +	bool resync_used;
>  	int status;
>  	int power;
>  };
> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ static int dell_uart_bl_command(struct dell_uart_backlight *dell_bl,
>  	dell_bl->resp_len = -1; /* Invalid / unset */
>  	dell_bl->resp_max_len = resp_max_len;
>  	dell_bl->pending_cmd = cmd[1];
> +	dell_bl->resync_used = false;
>  
>  	/* The TTY buffer should be big enough to take the entire cmd in one go */
>  	ret = serdev_device_write_buf(to_serdev_device(dell_bl->dev), cmd, cmd_len);
> @@ -208,8 +210,10 @@ static const struct backlight_ops dell_uart_backlight_ops = {
>  static size_t dell_uart_bl_receive(struct serdev_device *serdev, const u8 *data, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct dell_uart_backlight *dell_bl = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> +	const int max_passes = 2;
>  	size_t i;
>  	u8 csum;
> +	int pass;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dell_bl->dev, "Recv: %*ph\n", (int)len, data);
>  
> @@ -220,42 +224,70 @@ static size_t dell_uart_bl_receive(struct serdev_device *serdev, const u8 *data,
>  	}
>  
>  	i = 0;
> -	while (i < len && dell_bl->resp_idx != dell_bl->resp_len) {
> -		dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_idx] = data[i++];
> -
> -		switch (dell_bl->resp_idx) {
> -		case RESP_LEN: /* Length byte */
> -			dell_bl->resp_len = dell_bl->resp[RESP_LEN];
> -			if (dell_bl->resp_len < MIN_RESP_LEN ||
> -			    dell_bl->resp_len > dell_bl->resp_max_len) {
> -				dev_err(dell_bl->dev, "Response length %d out if range %d - %d\n",
> -					dell_bl->resp_len, MIN_RESP_LEN, dell_bl->resp_max_len);
> -				dell_bl->status = -EIO;
> -				goto wakeup;
> +	for (pass = 0; pass < max_passes; pass++) {
> +		while (i < len && dell_bl->resp_idx != dell_bl->resp_len) {

Hi,

Could the inner part be moved into a function so you wouldn't need to add 
the pass based approach but could just call the function again? I think 
that would be much easier to follow than adding a loop for retry.

If you end up doing that, please make the function refactoring in a 
separate change before adding the extra byte handling.

--
 i.

> +			dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_idx] = data[i++];
> +
> +			switch (dell_bl->resp_idx) {
> +			case RESP_LEN: /* Length byte */
> +				dell_bl->resp_len = dell_bl->resp[RESP_LEN];
> +				if (dell_bl->resp_len < MIN_RESP_LEN ||
> +				    dell_bl->resp_len > dell_bl->resp_max_len) {
> +					dev_err(dell_bl->dev,
> +						"Response length %d out if range %d - %d\n",
> +						dell_bl->resp_len, MIN_RESP_LEN,
> +						dell_bl->resp_max_len);
> +					dell_bl->status = -EIO;
> +					goto wakeup;
> +				}
> +				break;
> +			case RESP_CMD: /* CMD byte */
> +				if (dell_bl->resp[RESP_CMD] != dell_bl->pending_cmd) {
> +					dev_err(dell_bl->dev, "Response cmd 0x%02x != pending 0x%02x\n",
> +						dell_bl->resp[RESP_CMD], dell_bl->pending_cmd);
> +					dell_bl->status = -EIO;
> +					goto wakeup;
> +				}
> +				break;
>  			}
> -			break;
> -		case RESP_CMD: /* CMD byte */
> -			if (dell_bl->resp[RESP_CMD] != dell_bl->pending_cmd) {
> -				dev_err(dell_bl->dev, "Response cmd 0x%02x != pending 0x%02x\n",
> -					dell_bl->resp[RESP_CMD], dell_bl->pending_cmd);
> -				dell_bl->status = -EIO;
> -				goto wakeup;
> -			}
> -			break;
> +			dell_bl->resp_idx++;
>  		}
> -		dell_bl->resp_idx++;
> -	}
>  
> -	if (dell_bl->resp_idx != dell_bl->resp_len)
> -		return len; /* Response not complete yet */
> +		if (dell_bl->resp_idx != dell_bl->resp_len)
> +			return i; /* Response not complete yet, wait for more data */
> +
> +		csum = dell_uart_checksum(dell_bl->resp, dell_bl->resp_len - 1);
> +		if (dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_len - 1] == csum) {
> +			dell_bl->status = 0; /* Success */
> +			dev_dbg(dell_bl->dev,
> +				"Response OK for cmd 0x%02x, len %d: %*ph\n",
> +				dell_bl->pending_cmd, dell_bl->resp_len,
> +				dell_bl->resp_len, dell_bl->resp);
> +			goto wakeup;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Some EC firmware inserts a stray byte right after the cmd-echo
> +		 * byte. Try once to drop it and re-fetch the checksum byte from the wire.
> +		 */
> +		if (!dell_bl->resync_used && dell_bl->resp_len > MIN_RESP_LEN) {
> +			dell_bl->resync_used = true;
> +
> +			dev_warn(dell_bl->dev,
> +				 "Checksum mismatch got 0x%02x expected 0x%02x, dropping stray byte 0x%02x at offset %d\n",
> +				 dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_len - 1], csum,
> +				 dell_bl->resp[RESP_DATA], RESP_DATA);
> +
> +			memmove(&dell_bl->resp[RESP_DATA], &dell_bl->resp[RESP_DATA + 1],
> +				dell_bl->resp_len - RESP_DATA - 1);
> +			dell_bl->resp_idx = dell_bl->resp_len - 1;
> +			continue; /* re-fetch the last (checksum) byte and re-validate */
> +		}
>  
> -	csum = dell_uart_checksum(dell_bl->resp, dell_bl->resp_len - 1);
> -	if (dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_len - 1] == csum) {
> -		dell_bl->status = 0; /* Success */
> -	} else {
>  		dev_err(dell_bl->dev, "Checksum mismatch got 0x%02x expected 0x%02x\n",
>  			dell_bl->resp[dell_bl->resp_len - 1], csum);
>  		dell_bl->status = -EIO;
> +		goto wakeup;
>  	}
>  wakeup:
>  	wake_up(&dell_bl->wait_queue);
> 

-- 
 i.