Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7949: use spi_is_bpw_supported()

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 6/11/25 10:15 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:04:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Use spi_is_bpw_supported() instead of directly accessing spi->controller
>> ->bits_per_word_mask. bits_per_word_mask may be 0, which implies that
>> 8-bits-per-word is supported. spi_is_bpw_supported() takes this into
>> account while spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(8) does not.
> 
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/c8b8a963-6cef-4c9b-bfef-dab2b7bd0b0f@sirena.org.uk/
> 
> Reported-by yourself. I'm wondering if the Closes adds a value in this case.
> Otherwise I can do the same to maybe 10% of my patches, for instance. But
> I don't think I put Closes tag on whatever improvement potential bug fix
> I do report (read: notice) myself.

I included it so that Da Xue will know that this has been resolved and
doesn't need to do anything more. Normally I would have not included
it though.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> 
> Code wise LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
>