From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
"D Scott Phillips OS" <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@marvell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read()
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:52:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <853b9cfd-504d-0dcb-2a2c-8b8df75a9b60@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217182110.7176-16-james.morse@arm.com>
Hi James,
On 2/17/2022 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:
> __rmid_read() selects the specified eventid and returns the counter
> value from the MSR. The error handling is architecture specific, and
> handled by the callers, rdtgroup_mondata_show() and __mon_event_count().
>
> Error handling should be handled by architecture specific code, as
> a different architecture may have different requirements. MPAM's
> counters can report that they are 'not ready', requiring a second
> read after a short delay. This should be hidden from resctrl.
>
> Make __rmid_read() the architecture specific function for reading
> a counter. Rename it resctrl_arch_rmid_read() and move the error
> handling into it.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
...
> @@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ void resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
> memset(am, 0, sizeof(*am));
> }
>
> -static u64 __rmid_read(u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid)
> +int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid, u64 *val)
> {
> - u64 val;
> + u64 msr_val;
>
> /*
> * As per the SDM, when IA32_QM_EVTSEL.EvtID (bits 7:0) is configured
> @@ -180,14 +180,24 @@ static u64 __rmid_read(u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid)
> * are error bits.
> */
> wrmsr(MSR_IA32_QM_EVTSEL, eventid, rmid);
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_QM_CTR, val);
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_QM_CTR, msr_val);
>
> - return val;
> + if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_ERROR)
> + return -EIO;
> + if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *val = msr_val;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
From above we see that resctrl_arch_rmid_read() returns an int that could be
-EIO or -EINVAL ...
...
> @@ -319,15 +331,15 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> {
> struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(rr->r);
> struct mbm_state *m;
> - u64 chunks, tval;
> + u64 chunks, tval = 0;
>
> if (rr->first)
> resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
>
> - tval = __rmid_read(rmid, rr->evtid);
> - if (tval & (RMID_VAL_ERROR | RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)) {
> - return tval;
> - }
> + rr->err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rmid, rr->evtid, &tval);
> + if (rr->err)
> + return rr->err;
> +
Setting rr->err, an int, to the return of resctrl_arch_rmid_read() is ok and
can handle the negative error codes, but returning it here means that
__mon_event_count()'s return type should be changed,
it is currently u64.
> switch (rr->evtid) {
> case QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID:
> rr->val += tval;
> @@ -343,7 +355,7 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> * Code would never reach here because an invalid
> * event id would fail the __rmid_read.
> */
> - return RMID_VAL_ERROR;
> + return -EINVAL;
Same here ... __mon_event_count() is u64 still ...
> }
>
> if (rr->first) {
> @@ -419,9 +431,14 @@ void mon_event_count(void *info)
> }
> }
>
Also take care here ... ret_val in mon_event_count() is still u64 while
__mon_event_count() attempts to return negative errors.
> - /* Report error if none of rmid_reads are successful */
> - if (ret_val)
> - rr->val = ret_val;
> + /*
> + * __mon_event_count() calls for newly created monitor groups may
> + * report -EINVAL/Unavailable if the monitor hasn't seen any traffic.
> + * If the first call for the control group succeed, discard any error
> + * set by reads of monitor groups.
> + */
Additionally, if the first call fails, but a following read of monitor group
succeeds then the first call's error is discarded.
How about if the last sentence is replaced with:
"Discard error if any of the monitor event reads succeeded."
> + if (ret_val == 0)
> + rr->err = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index 0b48239f5920..70112dbfa128 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ u32 resctrl_arch_get_config(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
> u32 closid, enum resctrl_conf_type type);
> int resctrl_online_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d);
> void resctrl_offline_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d);
> +int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid, u64 *res);
>
> /**
> * resctrl_arch_reset_rmid() - Reset any private state associated with rmid
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 18:20 [PATCH v3 00/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2022-03-16 21:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2022-03-05 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43 ` James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43 ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-04 16:35 ` James Morse
2022-04-04 20:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2022-03-05 0:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:44 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-16 21:52 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-03-30 16:44 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-23 20:58 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-30 16:45 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2022-03-17 17:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:45 ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-03-23 21:17 ` Rob Herring
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-07 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] " Jamie Iles
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-15 6:41 ` Xin Hao
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-15 8:16 ` tan.shaopeng
2022-04-04 16:35 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=853b9cfd-504d-0dcb-2a2c-8b8df75a9b60@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®