From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:17:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjuOWpqLfiP4u2AT@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217182110.7176-22-james.morse@arm.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 06:21:10PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> resctrl_arch_rmid_read() returns a value in chunks, as read from the
> hardware. This needs scaling to bytes by mon_scale, as provided by
> the architecture code.
>
> Now that resctrl_arch_rmid_read() performs the overflow and corrections
> itself, it may as well return a value in bytes directly. This allows
> the accesses to the architecture specific 'hw' structure to be removed.
>
> Move the mon_scale conversion into resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
> mbm_bw_count() is updated to calculate bandwidth from bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 6 ++----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> index d3f7eb2ac14b..03fc91d8bc9f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,6 @@ void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> {
> struct kernfs_open_file *of = m->private;
> - struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res;
> u32 resid, evtid, domid;
> struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> struct rdt_resource *r;
> @@ -569,8 +568,7 @@ int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> domid = md.u.domid;
> evtid = md.u.evtid;
>
> - hw_res = &rdt_resources_all[resid];
> - r = &hw_res->r_resctrl;
> + r = &rdt_resources_all[resid].r_resctrl;
> d = rdt_find_domain(r, domid, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(d)) {
> ret = -ENOENT;
> @@ -584,7 +582,7 @@ int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> else if (rr.err == -EINVAL)
> seq_puts(m, "Unavailable\n");
> else
> - seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", rr.val * hw_res->mon_scale);
> + seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", rr.val);
>
> out:
> rdtgroup_kn_unlock(of->kn);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index e26a4d67e204..d6ce6ce91885 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -279,13 +279,13 @@ struct rftype {
>
> /**
> * struct mbm_state - status for each MBM counter in each domain
> - * @prev_bw_chunks: Previous chunks value read when for bandwidth calculation
> + * @prev_bw_bytes: Previous bytes value read when for bandwidth calculation
> * @prev_bw: The most recent bandwidth in MBps
> * @delta_bw: Difference between the current and previous bandwidth
> * @delta_comp: Indicates whether to compute the delta_bw
> */
> struct mbm_state {
> - u64 prev_bw_chunks;
> + u64 prev_bw_bytes;
> u32 prev_bw;
> u32 delta_bw;
> bool delta_comp;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 3a6555f49720..437e7db77f93 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
> struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
> struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_dom(d);
> struct arch_mbm_state *am;
> - u64 msr_val;
> + u64 msr_val, chunks;
>
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &d->cpu_mask))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -211,10 +211,11 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
> if (am) {
> am->chunks += mbm_overflow_count(am->prev_msr, msr_val,
> hw_res->mbm_width);
> - *val = get_corrected_mbm_count(rmid, am->chunks);
> + chunks = get_corrected_mbm_count(rmid, am->chunks);
> + *val = chunks * hw_res->mon_scale;
This can be moved out of the if/else if you make the following change:
> am->prev_msr = msr_val;
> } else {
> - *val = msr_val;
> + *val = msr_val * hw_res->mon_scale;
chunks = msr_val;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -229,7 +230,6 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
> void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free)
> {
> struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
> - struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
> struct rmid_entry *entry;
> u32 crmid = 1, nrmid;
> bool rmid_dirty;
> @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free)
> QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID, &val)) {
> rmid_dirty = true;
> } else {
> - val *= hw_res->mon_scale;
> rmid_dirty = (val >= resctrl_rmid_realloc_threshold);
> }
>
> @@ -296,7 +295,6 @@ int alloc_rmid(void)
> static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
> {
> struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
> - struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
> struct rdt_domain *d;
> int cpu, err;
> u64 val = 0;
> @@ -308,7 +306,6 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
> err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(r, d, entry->rmid,
> QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID,
> &val);
> - val *= hw_res->mon_scale;
> if (err || val <= resctrl_rmid_realloc_threshold)
> continue;
> }
> @@ -400,15 +397,14 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> */
> static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> {
> - struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(rr->r);
> struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> - u64 cur_bw, chunks, cur_chunks;
> + u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
>
> - cur_chunks = rr->val;
> - chunks = cur_chunks - m->prev_bw_chunks;
> - m->prev_bw_chunks = cur_chunks;
> + cur_bytes = rr->val;
> + bytes = cur_bytes - m->prev_bw_bytes;
> + m->prev_bw_bytes = cur_bytes;
>
> - cur_bw = (chunks * hw_res->mon_scale) >> 20;
> + cur_bw = bytes >> 20;
'bytes / SZ_1M' would be more readable and any decent compiler should
optimize a power of 2 divide. But maybe that's a separate change as
there are other cases of bytes to MB.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 18:20 [PATCH v3 00/21] " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2022-03-16 21:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2022-03-05 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43 ` James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43 ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-04 16:35 ` James Morse
2022-04-04 20:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2022-03-05 0:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:44 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-16 21:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:44 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-23 20:58 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-30 16:45 ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2022-03-17 17:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:45 ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-03-23 21:17 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-07 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] " Jamie Iles
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-15 6:41 ` Xin Hao
2022-04-04 16:36 ` James Morse
2022-03-15 8:16 ` tan.shaopeng
2022-04-04 16:35 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjuOWpqLfiP4u2AT@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®