From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] x86/sev: Prepare for using the RMPREAD instruction to access the RMP
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:22:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85583be0-5e8a-82ce-a134-95fe9d85a2a7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d62cc503d1e3278c3830f24462e3956233760ac.1727709735.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On 9/30/2024 8:52 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The RMPREAD instruction returns an architecture defined format of an
> RMP entry. This is the preferred method for examining RMP entries.
>
> In preparation for using the RMPREAD instruction, convert the existing
> code that directly accesses the RMP to map the raw RMP information into
> the architecture defined format.
>
> RMPREAD output returns a status bit for the 2MB region status. If the
> input page address is 2MB aligned and any other pages within the 2MB
> region are assigned, then 2MB region status will be set to 1. Otherwise,
> the 2MB region status will be set to 0. For systems that do not support
> RMPREAD, calculating this value would require looping over all of the RMP
> table entries within that range until one is found with the assigned bit
> set. Since this bit is not defined in the current format, and so not used
> today, do not incur the overhead associated with calculating it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index 0ce17766c0e5..103a2dd6e81d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -30,11 +30,27 @@
> #include <asm/cmdline.h>
> #include <asm/iommu.h>
>
> +/*
> + * The RMP entry format as returned by the RMPREAD instruction.
> + */
> +struct rmpentry {
> + u64 gpa;
> + u8 assigned :1,
> + rsvd1 :7;
> + u8 pagesize :1,
> + hpage_region_status :1,
> + rsvd2 :6;
> + u8 immutable :1,
> + rsvd3 :7;
> + u8 rsvd4;
> + u32 asid;
> +} __packed;
> +
> /*
> * The RMP entry format is not architectural. The format is defined in PPR
> * Family 19h Model 01h, Rev B1 processor.
> */
> -struct rmpentry {
> +struct rmpentry_raw {
> union {
> struct {
> u64 assigned : 1,
> @@ -62,7 +78,7 @@ struct rmpentry {
> #define PFN_PMD_MASK GENMASK_ULL(63, PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
> -static struct rmpentry *rmptable __ro_after_init;
> +static struct rmpentry_raw *rmptable __ro_after_init;
> static u64 rmptable_max_pfn __ro_after_init;
>
> static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
> @@ -247,8 +263,8 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> rmptable_start += RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ;
> rmptable_size = probed_rmp_size - RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ;
>
> - rmptable = (struct rmpentry *)rmptable_start;
> - rmptable_max_pfn = rmptable_size / sizeof(struct rmpentry) - 1;
> + rmptable = (struct rmpentry_raw *)rmptable_start;
> + rmptable_max_pfn = rmptable_size / sizeof(struct rmpentry_raw) - 1;
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/rmptable_init:online", __snp_enable, NULL);
>
> @@ -270,48 +286,77 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> */
> device_initcall(snp_rmptable_init);
>
> -static struct rmpentry *get_rmpentry(u64 pfn)
> +static struct rmpentry_raw *__get_rmpentry(unsigned long pfn)
pfn type has changed from u64 => unsigned long, is this intentional ?
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn > rmptable_max_pfn))
> - return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> -
> - return &rmptable[pfn];
> -}
> -
> -static struct rmpentry *__snp_lookup_rmpentry(u64 pfn, int *level)
> -{
> - struct rmpentry *large_entry, *entry;
> -
> - if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> + if (!rmptable)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> - entry = get_rmpentry(pfn);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry))
> - return entry;
> + if (unlikely(pfn > rmptable_max_pfn))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> + return rmptable + pfn;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_rmpentry(u64 pfn, struct rmpentry *entry)
> +{
> + struct rmpentry_raw *e;
> +
> + e = __get_rmpentry(pfn);
> + if (IS_ERR(e))
> + return PTR_ERR(e);
> +
> + /*
> + * Map the RMP table entry onto the RMPREAD output format.
> + * The 2MB region status indicator (hpage_region_status field) is not
> + * calculated, since the overhead could be significant and the field
> + * is not used.
> + */
> + memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
> + entry->gpa = e->gpa << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + entry->asid = e->asid;
> + entry->assigned = e->assigned;
> + entry->pagesize = e->pagesize;
> + entry->immutable = e->immutable;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __snp_lookup_rmpentry(u64 pfn, struct rmpentry *entry, int *level)
> +{
> + struct rmpentry large_entry;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> + return -ENODEV;
Can we rely on rmp_table check in __get_rmpentry() and remove the above check ?
If rmp_table is NULL, CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP is always cleared.
> +
> + ret = get_rmpentry(pfn, entry);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Regards
Nikunj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 15:22 [PATCH v3 0/8] Provide support for RMPREAD and a segmented RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] x86/sev: Prepare for using the RMPREAD instruction to access the RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-10-16 8:52 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]
2024-10-16 14:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-17 5:24 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-16 15:01 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/sev: Add support for the RMPREAD instruction Tom Lendacky
2024-10-16 10:46 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-17 15:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-17 16:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 4:21 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-18 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-18 15:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-21 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-21 17:10 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-21 17:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] x86/sev: Require the RMPREAD instruction after Fam19h Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 17:03 ` Dave Hansen
2024-09-30 18:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 13:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-18 4:26 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-18 13:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] x86/sev: Move the SNP probe routine out of the way Tom Lendacky
2024-10-16 11:05 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-18 4:28 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sev: Map only the RMP table entries instead of the full RMP range Tom Lendacky
2024-10-16 11:25 ` [sos-linux-ext-patches] " Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-18 4:38 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-18 13:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86/sev: Treat the contiguous RMP table as a single RMP segment Tom Lendacky
2024-10-17 11:05 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-18 5:59 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-18 13:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 14:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] x86/sev: Add full support for a segmented RMP table Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 6:32 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-18 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 8:37 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-18 15:06 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-09-30 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] x86/sev/docs: Document the SNP Reverse Map Table (RMP) Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 6:56 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-18 14:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-18 13:31 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85583be0-5e8a-82ce-a134-95fe9d85a2a7@amd.com \
--to=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®