mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] tools/nolibc: add a new "install_all_archs" target
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:41:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85c93c7c-239c-47aa-8a4e-d944c828314b@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250706070124.GD29601@1wt.eu>

On 2025-07-06 09:01:24+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:

<snip>

> If it is made clear that there is no interest in packaging uapi headers
> for archs not supported by nolibc, then this means that nolibc can be
> the place where the archs to be packaged is decided, and the two can
> be more tightly coupled, but as of now, this lack of interest is not
> yet obvious to me.

Given that this functionality was removed from kbuild recently I assume
that it there is limited interest to get it back.
Also in v2 none of the kbuild maintainers or list are Cc-ed anymore.

IMO we can apply patch 1 first and on its own.


Thomas

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-07 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-29 17:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] tools/nolibc: install unified multi-arch headers Willy Tarreau
2025-06-29 17:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] tools/nolibc: make the "headers" target install all supported archs Willy Tarreau
2025-06-29 20:17   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-29 17:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] tools/nolibc: add a new "install_all_archs" target Willy Tarreau
2025-06-29 20:44   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-06  7:01     ` Willy Tarreau
2025-07-07 15:41       ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85c93c7c-239c-47aa-8a4e-d944c828314b@t-8ch.de \
    --to=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®