mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Lubos Kolouch <lubos.kolouch@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Select DP BPC at mode set, rather than mode validate
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:56:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <864nvjcrx3.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120125221100.GK3896@phenom.ffwll.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1394 bytes --]

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:11:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> I'm a bit unhappy how generic code in intel_display.c calls function out
> of intel_dp.c. And choose_pipe_bpp_dither already has special cases for
> quite a few other encoders ... Could we add an ->adjust_bpc function to
> intel_encoder to separate this in a cleaner fashion?

Yeah, seems quite reasonable.

I can't find any reason why the lane count and link bw values are set in
fixup_mode and not just in intel_dp_set_mode. If we moved that, we could
use the bpp value computed in intel_display.c.

There's a weird mixture of code in ironlake_crtc_mode_set where it calls
intel_edp_link_config and uses those values when setting the CPU M/N
values for non-PCH eDP panels. That would also need fixing.

> I know that this isn't really the only layering violation in
> intel_display.c, but functions in that file have an uncanny ability to
> grow without bounds ;-)

The more we clean things up, the easier fixing bugs is in the future.

> As you've already said in another mail, this PCH_SPLIT here looks a bit
> strange. Could we unify these two paths here a bit?

The simple way to unify them would be to use
intel_choose_pipe_bpp_dither from the i9xx_crtc_mode_set path. Perhaps
that function could codify the currently simplistic rule used on i9xx?

-- 
keith.packard@intel.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2012-01-25 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-25 16:16 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Use correct bpc computations for DisplayPort Keith Packard
2012-01-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Force explicit bpp selection for intel_dp_link_required Keith Packard
2012-01-25 20:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jesse Barnes
2012-01-25 21:17     ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 21:50       ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-25 22:45         ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 21:52   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-27 10:30   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-02-06 12:12     ` Dave Airlie
2012-02-06 16:03       ` Daniel Vetter
2012-02-06 22:10       ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Select DP BPC at mode set, rather than mode validate Keith Packard
2012-01-25 22:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2012-01-25 22:56     ` Keith Packard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=864nvjcrx3.fsf@sumi.keithp.com \
    --to=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lubos.kolouch@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome