From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lubos Kolouch <lubos.kolouch@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Select DP BPC at mode set, rather than mode validate
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:56:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864nvjcrx3.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120125221100.GK3896@phenom.ffwll.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1394 bytes --]
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:11:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> I'm a bit unhappy how generic code in intel_display.c calls function out
> of intel_dp.c. And choose_pipe_bpp_dither already has special cases for
> quite a few other encoders ... Could we add an ->adjust_bpc function to
> intel_encoder to separate this in a cleaner fashion?
Yeah, seems quite reasonable.
I can't find any reason why the lane count and link bw values are set in
fixup_mode and not just in intel_dp_set_mode. If we moved that, we could
use the bpp value computed in intel_display.c.
There's a weird mixture of code in ironlake_crtc_mode_set where it calls
intel_edp_link_config and uses those values when setting the CPU M/N
values for non-PCH eDP panels. That would also need fixing.
> I know that this isn't really the only layering violation in
> intel_display.c, but functions in that file have an uncanny ability to
> grow without bounds ;-)
The more we clean things up, the easier fixing bugs is in the future.
> As you've already said in another mail, this PCH_SPLIT here looks a bit
> strange. Could we unify these two paths here a bit?
The simple way to unify them would be to use
intel_choose_pipe_bpp_dither from the i9xx_crtc_mode_set path. Perhaps
that function could codify the currently simplistic rule used on i9xx?
--
keith.packard@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-25 16:16 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Use correct bpc computations for DisplayPort Keith Packard
2012-01-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Force explicit bpp selection for intel_dp_link_required Keith Packard
2012-01-25 20:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jesse Barnes
2012-01-25 21:17 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 21:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-25 22:45 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 21:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-27 10:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-02-06 12:12 ` Dave Airlie
2012-02-06 16:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-02-06 22:10 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Select DP BPC at mode set, rather than mode validate Keith Packard
2012-01-25 22:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2012-01-25 22:56 ` Keith Packard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864nvjcrx3.fsf@sumi.keithp.com \
--to=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lubos.kolouch@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome