From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joachim.deguara@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86_64: offset apicid_to_node before use it before init_cpu_to_node
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:54:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440707221554p3866fdc8j34f49825162dbf1f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707221452.27002.ak@suse.de>
On 7/22/07, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 July 2007 02:49:41 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > [PATCH 3/3] x86_64: offset apicid_to_node before use it before init_cpu_to_node
> >
> > When acpi=off or there is no SRAT defined, apicid_to_node is got from K8
> > Northbridge PCI configuration space in k8_scan_nodes() in
> > arch/x86_64/mm/k8toplogy.c.
> > The problem is that it assumes bsp apic id is 0 at that point.
> > For four socket system with Quad core cpus installed, all cpus apic id
> > is offset by 4, and bsp apic id is 4.
> > For eight socket system with dual core cpus installed, all cpus apic id
> > is offset by 2, and bsp apic id is 2.
> > We need offset apicid_to_node array according to boot_cpu_id.--- bsp apic id.
> > before we use apicid_to_node array.
> > boot_cpu_id is only valid init_apic_mappings.
>
> <rant>
> This thing is getting more and more messy. If it gets any more complicated
> I promise I'll rip out the non ACPI support for quad core NUMA completely
> and let it require ACPI. Even the people who have a religious problem
> with ACPI will need to eventually get over it and LinuxBIOS just has
> to create proper tables, not pile hacks over hacks. It probably was a mistake in
> the first place to add it.
> </rant>
you will need to force every BIOS to have correct SRAT table.
>
> I don't think you can mess with apicid_to_node[] unconditionally here.
> e.g. for the ACPI case or for the Intel NUMA case you'll just break everything.
>
> What you should do is split init_apic_mappings() up and do a early
> call that just checks if the CPU has an APIC and maps it using the
> fixmap and reads boot_cpu_id. Then you can use that information
> in k8topology.c to create correct tables.
sounds good, i try to split one init_lapic_mappings from init_apic_mappings
Thanks
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-22 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-22 0:49 Yinghai Lu
2007-07-22 8:05 ` David Rientjes
2007-07-22 8:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-07-22 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-22 22:54 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2007-07-23 0:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440707221554p3866fdc8j34f49825162dbf1f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®