mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	shaojijie@huawei.com, horms@kernel.org, runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn,
	mmyangfl@gmail.com, hvr@gnu.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	danny.kukawka@bisect.de, mugunthanvnm@ti.com,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	manuel.lauss@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 10/11] net: au1000: keep the MAC stopped until the PHY link is ready
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:39:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ae31a1-381a-4f38-89fb-a19b35d06d5f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179329052077.3134.10233975410162013013@kernel.org>

On 10/29/26 09:15, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
> 
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 2 · Low: 1
> 
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
> 
> - [Medium] au1000_open() now calls phy_start() before au1000_init().
> - [Medium] Reopening the interface after a PHY status read that changed
>    phydev->link and then failed can leave MAC RX/TX disabled for good…
> - [Low] The new au1000_hard_stop() call in the link-down branch of
>    au1000_adjust_link() runs inside spin_lock_irqsave(&aup->lock).
> 
> --
> 
> net: au1000: keep the MAC stopped until the PHY link is ready
> 
> The patch moves phy_start() ahead of au1000_init() in au1000_open(). It
> also leaves MAC RX/TX disabled in au1000_init() while the PHY reports no
> link, and stops the MAC in the link-down branch of au1000_adjust_link().
> If au1000_init() fails, the PHY is now stopped.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
>> index 8c2dbf72652e9..c616ce616541f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
>> @@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ au1000_adjust_link(struct net_device *dev)
>>   		/* link state changed */
>>   
>>   		if (!phydev->link) {
>> -			/* link went down */
>> +			/* Stop the MAC before the PHY can remove its clocks. */
>> +			au1000_hard_stop(dev);
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> 
> au1000_adjust_link() holds spin_lock_irqsave(&aup->lock) at this point,
> and au1000_hard_stop() ends with:
> 
> 	wmb(); /* drain writebuffer */
> 	mdelay(10);
> 
> So each link-down now busy-waits 10 ms with interrupts off.
> 
> On close, the sequence looks like this:
> 
> au1000_close()
>    phy_stop()
>      -> au1000_adjust_link() -> au1000_hard_stop()   /* 10 ms */
>    spin_lock_irqsave(&aup->lock, flags)
>    au1000_reset_mac_unlocked()
>      au1000_hard_stop()                              /* 10 ms again */
>      two mdelay(2) for the reset                     /* 4 ms */
> 
> That is roughly 24 ms per close with interrupts off. The duplex branch
> already does something similar on link-up.
> 
> Is the second au1000_hard_stop() in au1000_reset_mac_unlocked() still
> needed now that the link-down callback stops the MAC?
> 
>>   			aup->old_speed = 0;
>>   			aup->old_duplex = -1;
>>   		}
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -740,6 +741,10 @@ static int au1000_init(struct net_device *dev)
>>   		control |= MAC_FULL_DUPLEX;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* The PHY may still be restoring its MII clocks after resume. */
>> +	if (!dev->phydev || dev->phydev->link)
>> +		control |= MAC_RX_ENABLE | MAC_TX_ENABLE;
>> +
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> 
> Can the MAC stay stopped after a reopen if old_link and old_duplex are
> stale?
> 
> With this change, RX/TX get turned back on after open only through
> au1000_adjust_link(). It calls au1000_enable_rx_tx() in just one place,
> the duplex branch:
> 
> 	if (phydev->link && (aup->old_duplex != phydev->duplex)) {
> 		...
> 		au1000_enable_rx_tx(dev);
> 
> Neither au1000_close() nor au1000_reset_mac_unlocked() resets old_link,
> old_speed or old_duplex.
> 
> Here is one sequence that could leave them stale. Assume autoneg is
> disabled and the link is up at 100/Full:
> 
> genphy_read_status()
>    genphy_update_link()        /* BMSR says link down, phydev->link = 0 */
>    genphy_read_status_fixed()  /* BMCR read fails with -ETIMEDOUT */
> phy_check_link_status()
>    returns the error before phy_link_down()
> 
> MDIO timeouts reach phylib since "net: au1000: report MDIO transaction
> timeouts". The PHY_ERROR handling, and a later phy_stop() into
> PHY_HALTED, call phy_link_down() only if phydev->link is still set.
> au1000_adjust_link() therefore never sees the link drop, so old_link
> stays 1 and old_duplex stays DUPLEX_FULL.
> 
> On the next open, au1000_init() leaves RX/TX disabled because
> phydev->link is 0. When the link comes back at the same speed and
> duplex, au1000_adjust_link() skips all three branches. The MAC stays
> stopped while carrier is reported up.
> 
> Before this patch, au1000_init() always set MAC_RX_ENABLE |
> MAC_TX_ENABLE, so this case recovered on reopen. Would resetting
> old_link, old_speed and old_duplex in the open or close path avoid it?
> 
>>   	writel(control, &aup->mac->control);
>>   	writel(0x8100, &aup->mac->vlan1_tag); /* activate vlan support */
>>   	wmb(); /* drain writebuffer */
>> @@ -928,16 +933,18 @@ static int au1000_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   		return retval;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (dev->phydev)
>> +		phy_start(dev->phydev);
>> +
>>   	retval = au1000_init(dev);
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> 
> Is it safe to start the PHY before the MAC is initialized?
> Documentation/networking/phy.rst says:
> 
>    Lastly, once the controller is ready to handle network traffic, you call
>    phy_start(phydev).
> 
> The commit message says "Start the PHY before initializing the MAC" but
> doesn't explain why the order has to change.
> 
> phy_start() resumes the PHY over MDIO:
> 
> au1000_mdiobus_read() / au1000_mdiobus_write()
>    au1000_enable_mac(dev, 0)
> 
> mac_enabled is 0 after probe or close, so this takes the MAC out of reset
> before au1000_init() runs. That contradicts the comment above
> au1000_init():
> 
>   * conserve power. Thus, whenever au1000_init() is called,
>   * the device should already be in reset state.
> 
> phy_start() then queues the state machine with zero delay, and
> au1000_init() does:
> 
> 	/* bring the device out of reset */
> 	au1000_enable_mac(dev, 1);
> 
> With force_reset set, this holds the MAC block in reset for about 2 ms,
> including mii_control and mii_data. It takes only aup->lock, not the
> mii_bus lock. au1000_mdio_read() and au1000_mdio_write() program
> mii_control, poll with mdelay(1) and read mii_data without any driver
> lock.
> 
> Could that forced reset land in the middle of an MDIO transaction from
> the phylib worker, for example on a preemptible UP kernel? A read could
> then return a reset value, a BMCR or advertisement write could be lost,
> or -ETIMEDOUT could put the PHY into PHY_ERROR.
> 
> If the worker runs first and already sees link up, au1000_adjust_link()
> takes the duplex branch (old_duplex == -1) and calls
> au1000_enable_rx_tx(). That happens before the MAC address and RX
> descriptors are programmed. au1000_init() then force-resets a MAC with
> RX/TX enabled.
> 
> There is also a problem with the new check in au1000_init(). It reads
> phydev->link under aup->lock, while phylib updates it under
> phydev->lock:
> 
> 	if (!dev->phydev || dev->phydev->link)
> 		control |= MAC_RX_ENABLE | MAC_TX_ENABLE;
> 
> genphy_update_link() can set link to 1 for a moment and then clear it:
> 
> 	phydev->link = status & BMSR_LSTATUS ? 1 : 0;
> 	...
> 	if (phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && !phydev->autoneg_complete)
> 		phydev->link = 0;
> 
> If au1000_init() reads that brief 1, RX/TX get enabled. The link-down
> callback never runs afterwards, because phydev->link still equals
> old_link.
> 
> Wouldn't that leave the MAC running with no link, which is the state
> this patch is meant to prevent?
> 
>>   	if (retval) {
>>   		netdev_err(dev, "error in au1000_init\n");
>> +		if (dev->phydev)
>> +			phy_stop(dev->phydev);
>>   		free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>>   		return retval;
>>   	}
> 
> [ ... ]
> 

Agreed on both medium findings. I’ll initialize the MAC before starting 
the PHY, clear the cached link state on open, and use the driver’s 
acknowledged link state during initialization.

I’ll retain the reset-time hard stop because watchdog recovery and other 
reset paths do not guarantee a preceding link-down callback. Reducing 
the IRQ-off delays needs separate work.

pw-bot: cr
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-27 22:31 [PATCH net 00/11] net: au1000: Bug fixes Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 01/11] net: au1000: recycle RX descriptors on allocation failure Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 02/11] net: au1000: clear all-multicast mode when restoring hash filtering Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 03/11] net: au1000: disconnect the PHY before freeing the MDIO bus Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:23     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 04/11] net: au1000: report MDIO transaction timeouts Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:25     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 05/11] net: au1000: serialize TX completion with packet submission Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:32     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 06/11] net: au1000: assign a valid MAC address without platform data Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:33     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 07/11] net: au1000: fix buffer descriptor free list insertion Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:35     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 08/11] net: au1000: restore receive filtering after MAC initialization Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:37     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 09/11] net: au1000: restore RX buffer addresses when restarting the MAC Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 10/11] net: au1000: keep the MAC stopped until the PHY link is ready Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 16:15   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-29 17:39     ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2026-10-27 22:31 ` [PATCH net 11/11] net: phy: smsc: wait for LAN83C183 power-down recovery Florian Fainelli
2026-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH net 00/11] net: au1000: Bug fixes Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-28  0:12   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86ae31a1-381a-4f38-89fb-a19b35d06d5f@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=danny.kukawka@bisect.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hvr@gnu.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \
    --cc=mmyangfl@gmail.com \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=shaojijie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®