From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Sync SCTLR_EL1 before a pVM's CPU_ON reads its endianness
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:14:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86mrrf1ux8.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111082746.1064567-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
On Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:27:46 +0000,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> pKVM handles a protected guest's PSCI CPU_ON at EL2 before the guest's
> EL1 sysregs are saved, so kvm_vcpu_is_be() reads a stale SCTLR_EL1. A
> guest that changes SCTLR_EL1.EE and calls CPU_ON before its next exit
> to the host starts the target vCPU with the old endianness.
>
> Sync SCTLR_EL1 before the read, as inject_sync64() does.
>
> Fixes: 9d4ec80be2eb4 ("KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs at EL2")
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> inject_sync64() is the only other reader on a protected guest's exit
> path of a guest-writable EL1 sysreg's copy, and it syncs that register
> first. Saving SCTLR_EL1 before the in-loop exit handlers instead would
> put the save on every protected exit for two readers. A non-protected
> guest's CPU_ON is handled by the host, after the sysregs are saved.
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> index fc0475f0877d1..e421f45383e0d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> @@ -1321,6 +1321,9 @@ static bool pvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
> goto error;
> }
>
> + /* Sync SCTLR_EL1 for kvm_vcpu_is_be(), as HVCs are handled before sysregs are resync'ed. */
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, SCTLR_EL1, read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR));
> +
> reset_state = &target->vcpu.arch.reset_state;
> WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->pc, smccc_get_arg2(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu));
> WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->r0, smccc_get_arg3(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu));
>
I think it'd make more sense to have a global primitive that pKVM
calls to synchronise whatever affects the control flow of a vcpu (yes,
control flow for PSCI_ON is a bit abusive, but hey...). It's a bit
more invasive, but at least we have a single spot to deal with this
stuff, and it doesn't affect the hot path.
Something like the hack below.
M.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/pkvm.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/pkvm.h
index 0261b2bc681f7..ef05265626b7c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/pkvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/pkvm.h
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ void kvm_init_pvm_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_reset_pvm_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_check_pvm_sysreg_table(void);
+void pkvm_sync_before_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int pkvm_reset_vcpu(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu);
struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *pkvm_mpidr_to_hyp_vcpu(struct pkvm_hyp_vm *vm, unsigned long mpidr);
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_PKVM_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index fc0475f0877d1..85da570ae1032 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -1321,6 +1321,8 @@ static bool pvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
goto error;
}
+ pkvm_sync_before_exception(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
+
reset_state = &target->vcpu.arch.reset_state;
WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->pc, smccc_get_arg2(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu));
WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->r0, smccc_get_arg3(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
index 32e82653ebf7e..f28a96d0e50de 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static u64 pvm_calc_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
}
}
-static void inject_sync64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
+void pkvm_sync_before_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
@@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ static void inject_sync64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
*/
__vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL1, read_sysreg_el1(SYS_VBAR));
__vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1, read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR));
+}
+
+static void inject_sync64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
+{
+ pkvm_sync_before_exception(vcpu);
kvm_pend_exception(vcpu, EXCEPT_AA64_EL1_SYNC);
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 8:27 Fuad Tabba
2026-11-11 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-11-11 11:23 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86mrrf1ux8.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®