mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth the max supportable by the hypervisor
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:58:29 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871txysnw2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140317054053.GF14162@thunk.org>

tytso@mit.edu writes:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> 
>> Note that with indirect descriptors (which is supported by Almost
>> Everyone), we can actually use the full index, so this value is a bit
>> pessimistic.  But it's OK as a starting point.
>
> So is this something that can go upstream with perhaps a slight
> adjustment in the commit description?

Well, I rewrote it again, see below.

> Do you think we need to be able
> to dynamically adjust the queue depth after the module has been loaded
> or the kernel has been booted?

That would be nice, sure, but...

> If so, anyone a hint about the best
> way to do that would be much appreciated.

... I share your wonder and mystery at the ways of the block layer.

Subject: virtio-blk: base queue-depth on virtqueue ringsize or module param

Venkatash spake thus:

  virtio-blk set the default queue depth to 64 requests, which was
  insufficient for high-IOPS devices. Instead set the blk-queue depth to
  the device's virtqueue depth divided by two (each I/O requires at least
  two VQ entries).

But behold, Ted added a module parameter:

  Also allow the queue depth to be something which can be set at module
  load time or via a kernel boot-time parameter, for
  testing/benchmarking purposes.

And I rewrote it substantially, mainly to take
VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC into account.

As QEMU sets the vq size for PCI to 128, Venkatash's patch wouldn't
have made a change.  This version does (since QEMU also offers
VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC.

Inspired-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Based-on-the-true-story-of: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index a2db9ed288f2..c101bbc72095 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -491,10 +491,11 @@ static struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
 static struct blk_mq_reg virtio_mq_reg = {
 	.ops		= &virtio_mq_ops,
 	.nr_hw_queues	= 1,
-	.queue_depth	= 64,
+	.queue_depth	= 0, /* Set in virtblk_probe */
 	.numa_node	= NUMA_NO_NODE,
 	.flags		= BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE,
 };
+module_param_named(queue_depth, virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth, uint, 0444);
 
 static void virtblk_init_vbr(void *data, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 			     struct request *rq, unsigned int nr)
@@ -558,6 +559,13 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		goto out_free_vq;
 	}
 
+	/* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */
+	if (!virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth) {
+		virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth = vblk->vq->num_free;
+		/* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */
+		if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC))
+			virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth /= 2;
+	}
 	virtio_mq_reg.cmd_size =
 		sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
 		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-19  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1394841445-16142-1-git-send-email-venkateshs@google.com>
2014-03-15  3:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 10:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-15 13:20     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 13:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-15 15:13     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-17  0:42   ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-17  5:40     ` tytso
2014-03-19  6:28       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-03-19 17:48         ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-25 18:50           ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-31  3:52             ` Rusty Russell
2014-04-01  2:27               ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 10:49                 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-04-02  7:36                   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871txysnw2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=fes@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=venkateshs@google.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome