From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth the max supportable by the hypervisor
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 06:57:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <990f1cbc-fa54-4cb2-a9ee-394a1a6d5f07@email.android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394854471-25700-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
On March 14, 2014 11:34:31 PM EDT, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>The current virtio block sets a queue depth of 64, which is
>insufficient for very fast devices. It has been demonstrated that
>with a high IOPS device, using a queue depth of 256 can double the
>IOPS which can be sustained.
>
>As suggested by Venkatash Srinivas, set the queue depth by default to
>be one half the the device's virtqueue, which is the maximum queue
>depth that can be supported by the channel to the host OS (each I/O
>request requires at least two VQ entries).
>
>Also allow the queue depth to be something which can be set at module
>load time or via a kernel boot-time parameter, for
>testing/benchmarking purposes.
>
>Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
>Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
>Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
>Cc: Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
>---
>
>This is a combination of my patch and Vekatash's patch. I agree that
>setting the default automatically is better than requiring the user to
>set the value by hand.
>
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>index 6a680d4..0f70c01 100644
>--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>@@ -481,6 +481,9 @@ static struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
> .free_hctx = blk_mq_free_single_hw_queue,
> };
>
>+static int queue_depth = -1;
>+module_param(queue_depth, int, 0444);
?
>+
> static struct blk_mq_reg virtio_mq_reg = {
> .ops = &virtio_mq_ops,
> .nr_hw_queues = 1,
>@@ -551,9 +554,14 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>*vdev)
> goto out_free_vq;
> }
>
>+ virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth = queue_depth > 0 ? queue_depth :
>+ (vblk->vq->num_free / 2);
> virtio_mq_reg.cmd_size =
> sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
> sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
>+ virtblk_name_format("vd", index, vblk->disk->disk_name,
>DISK_NAME_LEN);
>+ pr_info("%s: using queue depth %d\n", vblk->disk->disk_name,
>+ virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth);
Isn't that visible from sysfs?
>
> q = vblk->disk->queue = blk_mq_init_queue(&virtio_mq_reg, vblk);
> if (!q) {
>@@ -565,8 +573,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>*vdev)
>
> q->queuedata = vblk;
>
>- virtblk_name_format("vd", index, vblk->disk->disk_name,
>DISK_NAME_LEN);
>-
> vblk->disk->major = major;
> vblk->disk->first_minor = index_to_minor(index);
> vblk->disk->private_data = vblk;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-15 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1394841445-16142-1-git-send-email-venkateshs@google.com>
2014-03-15 3:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 10:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-03-15 13:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-15 15:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-17 0:42 ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-17 5:40 ` tytso
2014-03-19 6:28 ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-19 17:48 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-25 18:50 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-31 3:52 ` Rusty Russell
2014-04-01 2:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 10:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-04-02 7:36 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=990f1cbc-fa54-4cb2-a9ee-394a1a6d5f07@email.android.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=fes@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=venkateshs@google.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®