From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 01/14] perf tools: add debug prints
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:44:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738qmyp7i.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375719994-26482-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (Adrian Hunter's message of "Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:21 +0300")
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:21 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> It is useful to see the arguments to perf_event_open
> and whether the perf events ring buffer was mmapped
> per-cpu or per-thread. That information will now be
> displayed when verbose is 2 i.e option -vv
>
[SNIP]
>
> +static size_t perf_event_attr__fprintf(struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
> +{
> + size_t ret;
> +
> + ret = fprintf(fp, "------------------------------------------------------------\n");
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "perf_event_attr:\n");
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " type %u\n", attr->type);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " size %u\n", attr->size);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_period %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_period);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_freq %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_freq);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_type %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_type);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " read_format %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->read_format);
> +
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " disabled %u ", attr->disabled);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "inherit %u\n", attr->inherit);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " pinned %u ", attr->pinned);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclusive %u\n", attr->exclusive);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_user %u ", attr->exclude_user);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_kernel %u\n", attr->exclude_kernel);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_hv %u ", attr->exclude_hv);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_idle %u\n", attr->exclude_idle);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " mmap %u ", attr->mmap);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "comm %u\n", attr->comm);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " freq %u ", attr->freq);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "inherit_stat %u\n", attr->inherit_stat);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " enable_on_exec %u ", attr->enable_on_exec);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "task %u\n", attr->task);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " watermark %u ", attr->watermark);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "precise_ip %u\n", attr->precise_ip);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " mmap_data %u ", attr->mmap_data);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "sample_id_all %u\n", attr->sample_id_all);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_host %u ", attr->exclude_host);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_guest %u\n", attr->exclude_guest);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " excl.callchain.kern %u ", attr->exclude_callchain_kernel);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "excl.callchain.user %u\n", attr->exclude_callchain_user);
> +
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " wakeup_events %u\n", attr->wakeup_events);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " wakeup_watermark %u\n", attr->wakeup_watermark);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_type %#x\n", attr->bp_type);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_addr %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->bp_addr);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config1 %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config1);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_len %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->bp_len);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config2 %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config2);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " branch_sample_type %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->branch_sample_type);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_regs_user %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_regs_user);
> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_stack_user %u\n", attr->sample_stack_user);
Things like this likely being ended up with typo. How about this? (not tested)
#define __PRINT_ATTR(fmt, cast, field) \
fprintf(fp, " %-28s "fmt"\n", #field, cast attr->field)
#define PRINT_ATTR(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%u", ,field)
#define PRINT_ATTR_X64(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%#"PRIx64, (uint64_t), field)
#define PRINT_ATTR2(field1, field2) \
fprintf(fp, " %-28s %u %-28s %u\n", \
#field1, attr->field1, #field2, attr->field2)
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + ret += fprintf(fp, "------------------------------------------------------------\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 16:26 [PATCH V9 00/14] perf tools: some fixes and tweaks Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 01/14] perf tools: add debug prints Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 6:44 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-08-07 8:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 8:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 02/14] perf tools: allow non-matching sample types Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 03/14] perf tools: add pid to struct thread Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 04/14] perf tools: change machine__findnew_thread() to set thread pid Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 7:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-07 8:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 8:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 05/14] perf tools: tidy up sample parsing overflow checking Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 8:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-07 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 8:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-07 11:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 06/14] perf tools: remove unnecessary callchain validation Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 07/14] perf tools: remove references to struct ip_event Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 08/14] perf tools: move " Adrian Hunter
2013-08-07 8:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 09/14] perf: make events stream always parsable Adrian Hunter
2013-08-12 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 10/14] perf tools: move perf_evlist__config() to a new source file Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 11/14] perf tools: add support for PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTFIER Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 12/14] perf tools: expand perf_event__synthesize_sample() Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 13/14] perf tools: add a function to calculate sample event size Adrian Hunter
2013-08-05 16:26 ` [PATCH V9 14/14] perf tools: add a sample parsing test Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738qmyp7i.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome